Color me doubtful.
JK Rowling is no fool. She knows how money is made, and who gives it to her. This same line of crap was broadcast about the current movie, and there isn’t a hint of homosexuality in “Fantastic Beasts”. There is a bit of heterosexuality sexuality between the main stars.
Why would anyone sabotage their entire franchise for the temporary approval of a fringe minority with zero loyalty? Meanwhile whole generations are reading her books now, plus her movies and Universal’s parks are also adding nicely to her fortunes.
“there isn’t a hint of homosexuality in “Fantastic Beasts””
Not sure about that, the creepy exploitative relationship between Credence and the older man (his name escapes me I wasn’t paying that much attention) clearly indicates an abusive relationship between a vulnerable adolescent youth and a grooming older man.
It struck me as very much a homosexual angle, although hardly favourable to gay people.
Have to agree. I'd be the first to pick up on messages or tones about that, and it's not there. After the fact, I suppose, you could say Colin Farrell's grown man character was a little too familiar with Ezra Miller's character but that could be written off as someone wanting access to the other's powers.
Rowling is a multi multi millionaire so if it's true she is sucking up to the gay movie promoters I don't understand why. She has enough money and has enough of a following to blow them off.