Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brad from Tennessee

[Under the law, no manufacturer-stamped serial number is needed if you make a gun for personal use. ]

That doesn’t sound right.


2 posted on 11/13/2016 5:18:44 PM PST by headstamp 2 (Fear is the mind killer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: headstamp 2

It is...the serial numbers stamped are required to track the sale by a manufacturer.

Build your own and it doesn’t require tracking, because you manufactured it (albeit by buying a 90% lower) and aren’t transferring it.


4 posted on 11/13/2016 5:22:25 PM PST by 1_Inch_Group (Country Before Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: headstamp 2

Uppers plus 80% lowers, sounds like.


5 posted on 11/13/2016 5:24:11 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: headstamp 2
It is in the 1968 Gun Control Law which required every other newly manufactured gun to be serial numbered.

Hadn't been a problem for the previous 100 years and hasn't been a problem since.

6 posted on 11/13/2016 5:24:27 PM PST by Buffalo Head (Illegitimi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: headstamp 2
Why should you need a serial number on a firearm you make for your own personal use, other than to register it with the government?

There is no such thing as a "ghost gun", but if you want to see what they are talking about, google "80% lower".

8 posted on 11/13/2016 5:25:52 PM PST by ETCM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: headstamp 2

It is true.....


11 posted on 11/13/2016 5:31:00 PM PST by Squantos (Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: headstamp 2

Davy Crockett and Daniel Boone did not have SN’s on their rifles (or pistols).


13 posted on 11/13/2016 5:35:16 PM PST by Scrambler Bob (Still shooting, but Calif is making me a felon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: headstamp 2

I oppose nearly ANY gun law. This sounds like another bogus issue like “assault” rifles and “Saturday Night Specials”.


14 posted on 11/13/2016 5:36:16 PM PST by ZULU (We are freedom's safest place!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: headstamp 2
It is absolutely correct. It's called "freedom" and we need much more of it.

" ... shall not be infringed."

16 posted on 11/13/2016 5:40:58 PM PST by NorthMountain (Northmountain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: headstamp 2

Well, it is.


18 posted on 11/13/2016 5:45:41 PM PST by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: headstamp 2

[>Under the law, no manufacturer-stamped serial number is needed if you >make a gun for personal use. ]
>
>That doesn’t sound right.

It is the law. But, if you decide to sell it, it needs a serial number.

I have built several of these over the years both 1911s and AR-15s. All for my use.


22 posted on 11/13/2016 6:04:56 PM PST by ConsCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: headstamp 2

The regulation of sound suppressors should be ended. It’s a health issue ...


23 posted on 11/13/2016 6:05:40 PM PST by MHGinTN (A dispensational perspective is a powerful tool for spiritual discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: headstamp 2
headstamp 2 said: "That doesn’t sound right."

What doesn't sound right is that ANY firearm would have to have a serial number on it. The Founders certainly never intended this or they would have said so in the Second Amendment.

If we shoot armed criminals in the head, it won't matter where they obtained their weapons.

If Kalifornia continues on its present path, we will have to have serial numbers on knives, clubs, pointy sticks, and soda straws.

24 posted on 11/13/2016 6:11:16 PM PST by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: headstamp 2

“[Under the law, no manufacturer-stamped serial number is needed if you make a gun for personal use. ]

That doesn’t sound right.”

It is.


29 posted on 11/13/2016 6:16:57 PM PST by CodeToad (Ding Dong, the Bitch is Dead!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: headstamp 2

That is correct, you order an 80% finished receiver, do the work yourself, no SN. Selling it would then be a no-no. Believe it or not, I know several people who have done it, not speaking personally of course!


30 posted on 11/13/2016 6:17:33 PM PST by nobamanomore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: headstamp 2

It’s the law.


34 posted on 11/13/2016 6:40:39 PM PST by Lazamataz (TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: headstamp 2

Done it myself. Legally you can make one, just one. My wife has to make her own, I can’t do it for her. Once made it cannot be sold or transferred it has to be destroyed to get rid of it.


40 posted on 11/13/2016 7:04:24 PM PST by tupac (the crux of the biscuit is the apostrophe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: headstamp 2

True, but if you are going to sell/transfer you have to serialize it as I understand it.


55 posted on 11/13/2016 9:20:38 PM PST by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: headstamp 2

Its true. You can by 40% and 60% milled AR receivers..... and finish milling them yourself using your home tools.

They even make jigs designed to finish milling out thise receivers.

If you make your own it is yours....like bajing your own cake for yourself.

The “ghostgun” stuff is newly named to scare people.


56 posted on 11/13/2016 9:59:25 PM PST by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig (Repeal & replace Obamacare, tax reform, fix infrastructure, fixin military, Israel, kill enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: headstamp 2

No, that’s absolutely correct, and you can even sell such guns; the ATF freely admits this (though encouraging you to serialize your guns, supposedly to help establish ownership if they’re stolen). However, note the “personal use” caveat. You can’t make a hundred a year and sell them, because then it would be clear you’re manufacturing as a business and would, under current law, require a license. So this article, while on the edge of technical correctness, is a wildly misleading tempest in a teapot. Also note how they’ve dishonestly substituted “ghost guns” for “ghost gun kits” in several places, not to mention the very choice of the phrase “ghost gun” in the first place.


66 posted on 11/14/2016 10:17:45 AM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson