Hillary would be well advised to clam up about any implication that questions about her abuse - proven abuse - of classified information was unwarranted. The only thing between her and the hoosegow over that was the fig leaf that she didnt know what classified information was, and there was no intent to do anything wrong.Given that the writer of Hard Choices wanted its reader to understand that Hillary was no babe in the security woods, that first will not wash. The more so since protocols in the government had to be consciously violated to illegally strip the classification markings off of emails - emails which the government refused to release to the public unreacted, on security grounds. And which were found to exist, unreacted, on a computer used by a pedophile.
And given that her use of a clandestine, illegal server obstructed justice (in the sense that it was a transparent, once publicly known, effort to prevent the satisfaction of FOIA requests from unearthing Clinton Foundation and pay-to-play abuses by the Secretary of State), there is no want of obvious motivation on Mrs. Clintons part.
In her shoes I would not be taunting people who will soon be in a position to take the above information to a Grand Jury.
.
Trump has a covenant with the voters to prosecute Clinton.
He promised to do it, and that is what assured his election.
We need to hold his feet to the fire.
.