Bay Area immigrants fear deportation after Trump victory

San Jose Mercury ^ | November 12, 2016 | Tatiana Sanchez

[artichokegrower]

When Donald Trump was elected president, Esmeralda Soto was stunned. Then the fear began. The 24-year-old undocumented resident worries she will be deported under a president who has vowed to crack down on illegal immigration when he takes office.

[Freedom_Is_Not_Free]

Trump needs to end the anchor baby law. I never heard him say he was going to do this. This is the only thing I want that I did not hear him specifically say.

Please Mr. President Trump, no more anchor babies. If at neither of your parents is a citizen and you are born on American soil, go home — you are NOT an American citizen.

[Jack Hydrazine]

D’oh! I totally forgot about that.

[Jim Noble]

They’re worried about being deported?

Good. They should never have a moment’s rest until they are back home.

[Nuc 1.1]

Illegal alien not undocumented resident. What was done to these people by both dimocrat an republicans was completely evil.

[publius911]

That's right. We the American people did not get a chance to vote on this or have our elected representatives vote on this. Is was an imperial decree from Lord Obama. We can now reject it.

Created by an illegal Executive Order, Corrected by a legal, necessary one.

Don't even go there. The lawful results of an illegal order is to rescind the illegal result

Deport the arrogant, pottymouth Mexican lowlifes, even the illegal ones born here.

[publius911]

Just as concerned are the American lawbreakers faced with: making their own beds, mowing their own lawns, cleaning their own pools, etc.

I have a lower opinion of these "Americans" than I do about the legal invading welfare-sucking arrogant ingrates.

[publius911]

Actually Dave, I'm not. I'm saddened that our people still don't care about our Constitution.

You're right.
Defending illegal criminals is totally unrelated to "Constitutionality." Hanged by your own petard.

Our Constitution is Silent about what defines a "natural born citizen," and "authoritative opinions" are all over the place.

Do you know the difference between The Constitution and ordinary laws?
Throwing the righteous phrase "It's unconstitutional!" displays the ignorance of the speaker rather than statement of fact.

The fundamental difference between ordinary laws and a constitution that emerged from the American Revolution was that ordinary laws:

a. described specific illegal acts, while a constitution granted positive rights.
b. addressed economic questions, while a constitution addressed the distribution of political power.
c. could be passed and repealed by legislatures, while a constitution was a fundamental law ratified by the people and superior to all legislation.
d. applied to the states; a constitution was a document of the federal government, and can be repealed only by formal amendment.
e. were approved by the people, while a constitution emerged from the decisions of judges.

LINK:
Ordinary Laws are not part of the Constitution!

So, no, it is NOT unconstitutional to challenge an illegal executive order or an ordinary federal or state law.

[publius911]

Unanswered questions...

Is Tatiana Sanchez, the author of the article linked from the San Jose Mercury News, born and raised in the Bay Area, legal or illegal?

Until these illegal foreign invaders acknowledge their illegal status, no rational debate about a solution beneficial to all American citizens can take place.

I don't give a rat's patootie whether the illegal aliens object totheir name or not.
Nor do I care about illegal "mommie" 'giving up everything' for the illegal daughter'

What 'everything' exactly, dryback, did illegal mommie give up??