Go HOME!
Posted on 11/12/2016 8:07:08 AM PST by Mariner
I am sorry I meant 40 miles North East of Eugene.
They can shout as much as they want, but the fact remains federal money can be cut off to them soon.
You want illegals then you d nto receive any federal money, and the DOJ can go to court over your state violating federal law.
Once you get outside of the major urban areas, most of the people in all of the United States are wonderful and for the most part conservative.
As I said on a previous CA post, CA will probably benefit more than any other state due to President Trump.
Of that, there is no doubt.
CA is the biggest beneficiary of the 2016 election.
You prediction is right on the mark. The question is how to do it?? Frankly over the past dozen or so years they have tacitly seceded from the US anyway. Given the demographics now, it will be difficult. In the last senate election, there was no republican candidate on the ballot, that is stunning. What was there was far left and medium far left.
“Yeah, California, you will do this.
Cry all you want—you are done.”
As a life-long Californian, I say to Donald Trump, bring your people and take out our trash! And if any of our “elected officials” get in your way, prosecute and jail them!
“They will come around when they lose their precious funding. Trump is going to beat them at their own game.”
I am in favor of taking away all their funding. When their “citizens” find out that their gravy train isn’t going to make a return trip, a lot of them will self-deport.
“Why not turn Kali into the sanctuary state?”
Why don’t you go back to your double wide and fry something! There are a lot of us here in CA who are good decent conservatives. You are pi$$ing on us with your moronic rhetoric.
Battleground becomes scorched earth after California loses it’s government funds.
“This is not an easy place to be when we are wished dead and buried by our own Freepers.”
Thank you for saying that. Like any “organization.” FR has it’s share of low-IQ, brain-dead posters. I think that there may be a connection between them, Ted Cruz and Mark Levin. They live in some alternate universe where they don’t see what has happened in California as ultimately reaching them. I just wonder if these people had been the majority back at the founding of this country, if we would have been successful. In a perverse way, they are not unlike the current crop of Marxist “demonstrators” taking to the streets in our Blue Cities.
Accepted! At least California can serve as a model for the rest of the states as to what happens when your state is seeded with illegal aliens and single moms as your voting base. This was intentionally planned decades ago, and will spill into other states if it is NOT stopped.
If we’re lucky, the California pols supporting illegals will be jailed for conspiracy to break the nation’s immigration laws, and possibly treason.
What actually gives me great hope is that there was NOT a majority back at the founding of the country. Only a third wanted to break away from the Brits. And when you consider the Civil War, half the nation was against the union.
“Trump is going to defund all sanctuary cities.”
—
OH MY GOD!!!
When I first glanced at that I thought it said, “Trump is going to DEFEND all sanctuary cities.”
Time to clean the glasses.:-)
.
Also, EMPTY OUR DAMN PRISONS OF ILLEGALS AND SEND THEM ALL BACK WHERE THEY CAME FROM! That's a REAL money saver right there.
defund the cities and send the money to the communities that are supportive of going after ilegals
The sanctuary cities will pay for the wall!
Genius!
Go HOME!
the DOJ sued Arizona, and won, on the principal that the Federal government has exclusive dominion of immigration law.
The Supreme Court even Ruled as such, NO Federal Court will even entertain ANY suit from California as a result. This is Going to be FUN!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.