To: dontreadthis
Corker was being considered for VP, which would have been a horrible choice. We need someone to remove the Commies from the State Dept., so Corker doesn't seem like a good fit there, either. If Trump insists on having him, then stick Corker somewhere where he can't do any harm.
13 posted on
11/11/2016 9:33:09 AM PST by
Major Matt Mason
(Those that can, do, those that can't, work in the Beltway.)
To: Major Matt Mason
“I have no clue....can you even make your own in Cali?”
I vote for PLO ( Permanent Latrine Orderly).
To: Major Matt Mason
Agree. The benefit is a conservative gets appointed to fill Corkers seat.
48 posted on
11/11/2016 9:56:41 AM PST by
Defiant
(Repeat after me: President Trump.)
To: Major Matt Mason
Corker was being considered for VP, which would have been a horrible choice.Corker's name keeps popping up. Was the Corker VP consideration rumor ever confirmed as fact?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson