Your gloating reveals a base character without class.
First, I was one of the very first Trump supporters on FR and I wrote hundreds of posts and performed hundreds of hours of research to show that Donald Trump is amazing and that he would have widespread appeal:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3330070/posts?page=86#79
Second, after watching Luis Gutierrez beam how he and his ilk were going to have millions upon millions of Latinos (illegals) get registered to vote against Trump AND how Obama was going to grant amnesty to 11 million illegals, I POSTED A VANITY TEMPLATE OF A FEDERAL INJUNCTION LAWSUIT on FR as Breaking News and I suggested that we find a way quickly to get the lawsuit in motion to stop Obama’s Executive Amnesty. And another Freeper who I respect and admire greatly was able to get the information in front of Governor Abbott in TX (then TX AG) and that led to the 26-state lawsuit versus Obama and DHS; Judge Hanen heard the case and issued the preliminary injunction. This was all originated by me.
I originated many more things and provided hours upon hours of support to like-minded Freepers and others outside FR that know.
When I heard and saw the evidence of Soros controlling the software for GEMS and for various electronic voting machines, I sprang into action and performed research on the subject.
Much fraud did occur in this election. The election was not a landslide which I hoped for and if not for fraud, I believe it would have been a landslide.
The problem with fraud in electronic voting will not go away unless reforms and investigations are initiated to produce uniform secure standards for electronic voting and counting.
In the context of this post above, your remarks are baseless and without merit; they contribute zero to the discussion and the genuine concerns. You claim to be a PhD but I doubt it. PhDs of high regard do not gloat. They are the most humble of human beings with the awareness that what they don’t know far outweighs what they do know.
No -- I'm not gloating. I am expressing annoyance that, even now, you cannot admit that you over-reacted.
I understand the fear of voter fraud: but the express mechanism which you warned against, in the post where you affected to condescend to me about Excel (and which, by the way, you never refuted), is obviously false. Else Hillary would have won.
First, I was one of the very first Trump supporters on FR and I wrote hundreds of posts and performed hundreds of hours of research to show that Donald Trump is amazing and that he would have widespread appeal:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3330070/posts?page=86#79
I am glad to hear of this: but the address you gave above was malformed, and I had to scroll up on the thread to find your actual post on the prior page.
Second, after watching Luis Gutierrez beam how he and his ilk were going to have millions upon millions of Latinos (illegals) get registered to vote against Trump AND how Obama was going to grant amnesty to 11 million illegals, I POSTED A VANITY TEMPLATE OF A FEDERAL INJUNCTION LAWSUIT on FR as Breaking News and I suggested that we find a way quickly to get the lawsuit in motion to stop Obama’s Executive Amnesty. And another Freeper who I respect and admire greatly was able to get the information in front of Governor Abbott in TX (then TX AG) and that led to the 26-state lawsuit versus Obama and DHS; Judge Hanen heard the case and issued the preliminary injunction. This was all originated by me.
That's great. You know, you might have troubled to give the link to that as well, back when you were posting private FReepmails of mine. ;-)
I originated many more things and provided hours upon hours of support to like-minded Freepers and others outside FR that know.
That's DEPLORABLE. Top Kek.
When I heard and saw the evidence of Soros controlling the software for GEMS and for various electronic voting machines, I sprang into action and performed research on the subject.
Much fraud did occur in this election. The election was not a landslide which I hoped for and if not for fraud, I believe it would have been a landslide.
Absolutely agree. I have posted similar sentiments this morning.
The problem with fraud in electronic voting will not go away unless reforms and investigations are initiated to produce uniform secure standards for electronic voting and counting.
I would rather go to electronically-read paper ballots with the originals retained, and purple ink on the fingers; but also to clean the voter rolls of deceased, multiple addresses, and to require photo ID to vote: for if the whole point of "Motor Voter" was to make it easy to register to vote WHILE GETTING ONE'S DRIVERS LICENSE, how then can it be an intolerable burden to show that same drivers license while voting? And eliminate early voting entirely. (Trump won election day voting in MINNESOTA, 2-1. How many ballots were manufactured early, and were ready to be manufactured late, in Michigan and Pennsylvania and elsewhere?)
In the context of this post above, your remarks are baseless and without merit; they contribute zero to the discussion and the genuine concerns. You claim to be a PhD but I doubt it. PhDs of high regard do not gloat. They are the most humble of human beings with the awareness that what they don’t know far outweighs what they do know.
That, I fear, is a failure of communication: your posts to which I most strongly objected, were those phrased and cached not as "I greatly fear lest untoward event XYZ come to pass" but "OH NOES WE IZ DOOMED. THERE'S NOTHING WE CAN DO TO STOP IT."
Had you chosen the former language, I would never have flamed you.
And, you can believe whatever wish about my Ph.D. as your evident butthurt will not affect its objective existence one whit.
I will, however, end by saying that despite our fears, and through the united efforts of many, the good guys won. Let us work as best we may, using both your suggestions and mine, to cut off the hydra of voter fraud. How do you think Trump can effectuate reforms, to what the courts have continually ruled is a STATE responsibility?