Posted on 11/05/2016 10:58:47 AM PDT by i88schwartz
Brooks said the less educated and non-college educated whites are going to vote for Donald Trump no matter what. He added, "people are just going with their gene pool."
"Basically, less educated or high school-educated whites are going to Trump," Brooks told host Judy Woodruff. "It doesn't matter what the guy does. And college-educated going to Clinton."
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
Dear Brooksie: bite my college-educated big one, you elitist bag.
I was going to; but the ENVIRONAZIS threatened to have my family executed if I did.
What a crock, hubby is Ret Jr. College Prof and Ret. SCPO
I have some college, we both already voted Trump. Most of his cousins are college educated and they are voting Trump.
Both my sisters and their husbands only HS educated voting Trump. So are their children some are college educated some aren’t.
Ditto goes for hubby’s College educated 4 children. And their children who are old enough to vote, 1 grandson is college Freshman..Trump voter his first presidential election.
Most of my friends are varying degrees of education and are Trump voters.
Is this the guy that was impressed with the crease in Obama’s pants? Good grief. What basis are you using?
This is what this rumpwipe said in 2009!
I dont want to sound like Im bragging, Brooks recently told me, but usually when I talk to senators, while they may know a policy area better than me, they generally dont know political philosophy better than me. I got the sense he knew both better than me.
That first encounter is still vivid in Brookss mind. I remember distinctly an image ofwe were sitting on his couches, and I was looking at his pant leg and his perfectly creased pant, Brooks says, and Im thinking, a) hes going to be president and b) hell be a very good president. In the fall of 2006, two days after Obamas The Audacity of Hope hit bookstores, Brooks published a glowing Times column. The headline was Run, Barack, Run.
Obama sees himself as a Burkean, Brooks says. He sees his view of the world as a view that understands complexity and the organic nature of change. Moreover, after the Bush years, Brooks seems relieved to have an intellectual in the White House again. I divide people into people who talk like us and who dont talk like us, he explains. Of recent presidents, Clinton could sort of talk like us, but Obama is definitelyyou could see him as a New Republic writer. He can do the jurisprudence, he can do the political philosophy, and he can do the politics. I think hes more talented than anyone in my lifetime. I mean, he is pretty dazzling when he walks into a room. So, thats why its important he doesnt fuck this up.
Brooks is such a faux-intellectual. His books and articles are pablum for progressives who want to think they are open-minded because they read works by a “conservative” such as Brooks.
The tool that stated it doesn't believe it. He (like all Leftist) believes that everyone else is dumb. It is an attempt to keep some of those voters -like the 20 to 25+ age group- that are not supporting Hillary, to not vote for Trump.
White Men, + "uneducated"= racists/rednecks/flyover country/Christians/bumpkins/unwashed masses.
There's more to be said on this, I just don't feel like typing.
Brooks has that “Podesta Molesta” look about him.
These people (the so called “elites”), paint with a broad brush to try and demoralize the unwashed masses.
They purposely do this to dismiss or marginalized people like me who are better educated, have more experience and are at least equally traveled as they are.
Oh btw, Stalin used to shoot these types of people.
5.56mm
This JD/PhD (Georgetown and University of Chicago, respectively) is voting for Trump.
And all those educated far beyond their intelligence will still vote dem,
Brooksie, ol' buddy, ol' pal, you just proved that you're not an elitist prick, after all. Instead, you're a dumbass prick.
It was Robert Mitchum.
The truly risible thing is, the MSM used to trot Brooks out as their token "conservative."
I have two post graduate degrees and I voted for Trump, right along with my college graduate husband.
This deplorable with a BM and MM from Northwestern University will be casting her vote for Trump.
Imagine if any conservative or Republican - whether a politician or a pundit - made derogatory comments about the “gene pool” of Democrats; there would be instant and universal cries of “racism.”
But then, they're not entirely dissimilar either.
Main difference = hair
I have a master’s and a doctorate. My spouse has a doctorate. We both voted Trump. MAGA.
Ah, I thank you.
I stand corrected.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.