Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Galactic Overlord-In-Chief; randita

The state has moved left Presidentialy (and ironically GOP on the State level as ticket splitting has ceased) since W, so I’d wager 7 at about the max or close to it. No way in hell 15.

It even gave W a lower % in 2004 than 2000 (VT and SD the only other states, ironically SD because of Dassole driving Indian turnout, Bush coattails sunk him but he lowered Bush’s %, math is crazy) by an eyelash 0.01% less, I’d be very curious to see what it would have been without Edwards on the ticket. Probably a very paltry increase.


107 posted on 11/04/2016 12:36:44 AM PDT by Impy (Never Shillery, Never Schumer, Never Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: Impy

We shall soon see the margin. And yes, I noted the slight decrease for Dubya in the state from ‘00 to ‘04, but again, I attribute that to Edwards’ presence on the ticket. There was also about 600k more voters to turn out, which just about spread evenly. I think Edwards was looking for a way out of running for the Senate again because he was in a cursed seat and his popularity there was always about a mile wide and an inch deep. Burr likely would’ve beaten him by a narrow margin.


108 posted on 11/04/2016 12:58:14 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Je Suis Pepe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson