SMOKING GUN! Wikileaks Email Shows Intent to Destroy Emails After Reports on Secret Email Server

The Gateway Pundit ^ | 1 Nov 16 | Jim Hoft

[xzins]

SMOKING GUN! Wikileaks Email Shows Intent to Destroy Emails After Reports on Secret Email Server

Jim Hoft Nov 1st, 2016 11:10 am Leave a Comment

WIKILEAKS DISCOVERS THE SMOKING GUN–
The Clinton Campaign discussed destroying email evidence after story broke nationally that Hillary Clinton had an illegal homebrew server for her emails.

On March 2, 2015 The New York Times reported that Hillary Clinton used a personal email server as Secretary of State.

On March 2, 2015 Hillary Clinton’s top aide and attorney wrote John Podesta that “we are going to have to dump all those emails.”

They are finally busted.
Congratulations, Wikileaks. You did it.

Director Comey, here, I've done your job for you. Here is the intent. #podestaemails25 pic.twitter.com/2xYNqK4EHI

— MicroSpookyLeaks™ (@WDFx2EU7) November 1, 2016

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Get news like this in your Facebook News Feed,

Gateway Pundit

---

[xzins]

We truly need a haiku for this moment

[Diogenesis]

Lynch, McCabe, & Comey before an chance meeting with Clinton.
“Checks cashed. Evidence destroyed. Snort.”

[UKrepublican]

Sorry for being stupid, but I’m not quite sure what you are saying here.

My point was, based on the wording of Podesta, dump could mean publicly release as in ‘sooner’ rather than later.

And that intent to destroy evidence is already shown by the bleaching fact.

Are you saying its possible that they bleached not knowing it is illegal to do so?

[The G Man]

C’mon. If we’ve learned anything from these Podesta emails is that he is one sharp cookie. He knows way, way better than to state in writing that we need to destroy evidence. How many of these emails involve these guys coordinating a conference calls to discuss this stuff, because they know they can’t discuss in writing?

And as for folks who claim “dump” isn’t synonymous with release ... why do they call politicians pushing out bad news on the weekend as “Friday Afternoon Document Dumps”??

[xzins]

Can we put McCain and Romney at that trough, too, or is that hoping for too big a bite. :>)

[JudyinCanada]

To Wikileaks, a dump means to put them out for everyone to see.

I think it’s ridiculous to pretend there was no intent.

[UKrepublican]

I totally agree.

Its always been the most skeptical angle of this all for me.

Evil people like Clinton didn’t get as far as she is by documenting her crimes so blatantly.

Or maybe she really is just that naive about technology?

[xzins]

Comey knew about Bleachbit and STILL thought he couldn’t find intent. (Which Giuliani says is unbelievable.)

So, with bleachbit, and destruction of cell phones, and lying multiple times, and the unsecure server itself in existence, we NOW have someone saying to dump all the data on “those emails” that were just mentioned in the news.

[Red Steel]

You’re correct. Looking at all the evidence in totality, the obstruction of justice, and tampering and destroying, ‘dump’ means hide or wipe away with “Bleachbit” the memory wipe program. Notice all the dancing on the head of a pin to explain otherwise.

[Haiku Guy]

The cold sea water
Washes around the rats’ feet
It is time to go

[FamiliarFace]

Does anyone know which Wikileak email # this is? It’s always good to check the actual document. There are some out there ready to deceive us because we want to believe we have the smoking gun.

[xzins]

BTW, I think you are far from stupid.

As someone has said, why not just say “release to the public.” After all, they were talking within the inner circle with no expectation of their words becoming public.

[Red Steel]

To Podesta who wrote this it means destroy the emails.

[xzins]

LOL!

Excellent

5
7
5

[Mr. Douglas]

I’m with you except for one thing nagging at me: Michelle deleted three years of Twitter today.

What if this stuff PROVES it goes all the way to the top?

[HangUpNow]

As we expected. Yes, with 110% surety, "Intent" has now been established without an iota of doubt.

The initial "NO INTENT" conclusion for non-indictment from Comey was THE biggest pile of BS ever.

I wonder if Jim-Bob addresses "intent" factor after the 650,000 emails have been examined THIS time?

Q: What is the US's policy on extradition with Switzerland?

[newgeezer]

This should be HUGE.

But, the lapdog media, rather than report the NEWS—much less do any investigative reporting of their own—exist only to help her figure a way out of this, should it ever become a problem.

[sphinx]

Honestly, Hillary deserves to be in prison, but “dump” could just as easily be interpreted as “publicly release” as opposed to “delete”. Not sure this is the “smoking gun”.

That was my first reaction as well -- but remember, they then went out and lied repeatedly about the status, slow-walked all responses, and ultimately deleted the emails. A fair inference can be drawn from that fact. Of course, that will not stop Clinton, Podesta and the rest of the gang from insisting that they intended "dump" to mean "release," and that incompetent underlings misunderstood. This, however, will not be believed by anyone outside the Obama Department of Justice.

[djpg]

It all depends upon what the meaning of the word “yoga” is.

[peeps36]

We're talking about the corrupt Clinton family here, some normal family.