Hillary Clinton Corruption Finder - Still Silenced by Twitter

Hillary Clinton Corruption Finder ^ | October 31, 2016 | Stacey Reiman

[31R1O]

But #HillaryforPrision wasn’t!

[nerdgirl]

yes that was funny - I think they banned “#HillaryForPrison” so somebody started that one, although some say the Twitter overlords changed it themselves to it would not trend!

[bigbob]

Twitter can do whatever it wants to do. Just as any website owner.

[Bitsy]

Some people need jail time and I don’t mean just Hillary. After this election we need to evaluate our media and maybe some investigations are in order for the lying swine who used to be called media and are now mouth pieces for the leftist/globalist/humanist democrats.

[nerdgirl]

yup, they can. It’s up to the anti censorship movement to create something better, and drive people to it.

[bigbob]

but it is trending

[nerdgirl]

However Twitter does sell its data. And the question is: do they disclose the censorship skew to their customers?

[nerdgirl]

#HillaryForPrision - Spanish way to say prison, is trending.

not

#HillaryForPrison

[nerdgirl]

Definitely! Here is another meme for you guys! This is the kind of stuff that makes the censorship police at Twitter really mad. Although they DON'T take down posts laced with profanity, or about things I can't even mention here.

[RayChuang88]

That’s why I said that private dinner meeting with President Obama (and his Senior Adviser Valerie Jarrett) and the CEO’s of Apple, Cisco Systems, Facebook, Google, Netflix, Oracle, Twitter and Yahoo! back in February 17, 2011 needs to be investigated by Congress. Was there a “gentlemen’s agreement” reached to censor the Right by these companies? If so, then all of them could be potentially liable in a First Amendment lawsuit because they censored on behest of the US government, a clear violation of Free Speech rights.

[Perseverando]

Great job! Thanks so much for all your hard work on this project to expose the Clinton corruption scandals.

[Fester Chugabrew]

Posted on FB wall with #HillaryForPrison. 1 like and share share so far. Nice work, I must say.

[nerdgirl]

Thanks! I really need more data - boy we need the key ones from that 650,000 emails MOTHERLODE as Trump called it! But I’ll keep going today when I”m not carting costume laden kids around - my daughter is the cutest raccoon you’ve ever seen, having decided for that in favor of a witch (too much like Hillary, lol).

[nerdgirl]

thanks!!

[nerdgirl]

Very, very disturbing. There is going to be a new field cropping up: Conservative Tech Activism. I guess Milo Yiannopoulos is known for this, but it’s not anything I ever knew was such a problem. The tech industry is what decides what information people receive - and as such, there should be some kind of attempt to make sure they can’t all collude to deceive people and suppress free speech. So I don’t know what will happen after the election, only that my own future has changed in the last month. I hope to become involved with helping fight this.

[Bitsy]

that private dinner meeting with President Obama (and his Senior Adviser Valerie Jarrett) and the CEO’s of Apple, Cisco Systems, Facebook, Google, Netflix, Oracle, Twitter and Yahoo!
Yes. We can not forgot the treasonous acts they have committed against our republic. Another time, and their heads would be rolling. Investigation and jail.

[RayChuang88]

If Trump wins this election, then both Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey could be hauled in front of Congress to find out if such a "gentleman's agreement" with the Obama Administration to censor their social media services against the political Right exists dating from that February 17, 2011 private dinner. In fact, they may ask the same question to Reed Hastings, the CEO of Netflix, if the search and discovery algorithms for movies and TV shows were doing the same thing after that dinner. If the answer is yes, then Facebook, Twitter and Netflix could be hit with substantial fines, redoing their search and discovery algorithms by court order and Zuckerberg, Dorsey and Hastings could be forced out of their CEO positions.

[bicyclerepair]

Never understood the attraction to twitter or facebook.

[nerdgirl]

I agree completely. Much of the public thinks an “algorithm” is some mysterious concept like writing encryption functions or something! In fact, algorithms can be very simple. It’s just the set of instructions that the program uses to achieve a result, like a recipe. So the censorship code is likely to be something people will be able to understand very easily - for example, Twitter has something like this silly example below in place:

var shadowBanUsers = [’seanHannity’, ‘rushLimbaugh’, ‘mikeCernovich’, ‘milo’]

Then if the tweet “puller upper” gets a hit on one of these names, BAM they are muted.

If these companies are doing what it seems obvious that they are doing, it won’t take brainiac experts from MIT to see how they’ve done it. It will be quite plain, with KEYWORDS listed in arrays, with functions that are clearly intented to suppress certain users, phrases, and trends.