Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zakeet

I’m pretty sure it’s illegal to use a telephoto lens to photograph someone inside their home.


8 posted on 10/29/2016 11:03:03 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Moonman62

I’m sure the paparazzi will take your advice to heart.


11 posted on 10/29/2016 11:05:44 PM PDT by Az Joe (Desu Hoc Vult!! The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62

No intent.


14 posted on 10/29/2016 11:06:27 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62

She doesn’t even have enough brains to keep the blinds closed.


17 posted on 10/29/2016 11:07:06 PM PDT by Rome2000 (SMASH THE CPUSA-SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS-CLOSE ALL MOSQUES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62

Not meaning to be rude, but I don’t think many alt-rt care about the niceties of law anymore. The battle is joined. The fight is to the death. It is simply the way it is.


63 posted on 10/29/2016 11:56:10 PM PDT by lafroste (Look at my profile page. Thanks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62

Not in the least.


75 posted on 10/30/2016 12:22:07 AM PDT by patton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62

This was quite a thread or two at the time here on FR:

Tribeca family loses legal battle against photographer who took their pictures without their consent inside their home

Lensman Arne Svenson acknowledged that he snapped the unguarded shots of Martha and Matthew Foster and their young children through the floor to ceiling windows of their loft, which is across the street from his apartment.

The judges said Svenson’s protracted lurking in the shadows of his darkened apartment was “disturbing” but neither a violation of criminal stalking laws nor a violation of the family’s civil rights as state law is now written because Svenson’s photos were works of art.

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/family-loses-legal-battle-photog-pics-article-1.2179583


83 posted on 10/30/2016 12:38:00 AM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62

If the rule of law doesn’t apply to HRC, it doesnt apply to thee.


131 posted on 10/30/2016 4:38:47 AM PDT by DownInFlames
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62

Show us the statute. I will wager none exists.


157 posted on 10/30/2016 5:19:47 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA (war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength, obama loves America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62

“I’m pretty sure it’s illegal to use a telephoto lens to photograph someone inside their home.”

So? Hopefully Trump will see to it that she is watched through some bars in prison.


227 posted on 10/30/2016 8:49:20 AM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62

260 posted on 10/30/2016 11:47:36 AM PDT by Delta 21 (Patiently waiting for the jack booted kick at my door.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson