Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FredZarguna

Since the first investigation was not closed, wouldn’t that warrant be good still?


56 posted on 10/29/2016 7:12:29 PM PDT by Ingtar (Don't blame me. I already voted for Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: Ingtar

“Since the first investigation was not closed, wouldn’t that warrant be good still?”

That is what I am thinking.


63 posted on 10/29/2016 7:20:47 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: Ingtar
Since the first investigation was not closed, wouldn’t that warrant be good still?

If by first investigation you mean the original Clinton email thingy, (technical legal term) there was no warrant obtained. The FBI was denied access by State and did not obtain warrants. They subsequently examined the computers under an immunity deal, not a warrant.

If by first investigation you mean Anthony Weiner's thingy (technical medical term) my understanding is that there was no warrant either, and that computer was surrendered voluntarily for examination.

82 posted on 10/29/2016 7:44:34 PM PDT by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson