Posted on 10/29/2016 4:56:53 PM PDT by ameribbean expat
" Michael Isikoff @Isikoff · 24m24 minutes ago Washington, DC
Update: FBI still does not have warrant to read Abedin emails; Comey wrote letter having "no idea" what was in them "
I assume they could read the addressees though.
Isakoff says still no warrant.
She has to say that. She was granted immunity based on the condition that she turn over all her devices with official emails. If she knew about it and didn’t turn over the laptop, he immunity is null and void. However it shouldn’t be hard to prove she used that computer.
One irony in all this, it was the Clintons who introduced Huma and the Wiener in the first place.
Nick Danger....Third Eye.
L
And she doesn’t know how her emails wound up on the Russians, Chinese, North Korea computers.
How did classified info get into your email system, Huma?
No one really cares how Carlos Danger stole them from you.
The little fairy did it
The Washington post is still if full protection mode I see.
This is BS they KNOW what is in them, just saying they don’t because of EVERYBODY demanding they release them!!!!
Chaffetz on Friday began to tighten the noose asking McCabe for data: -- > https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/2016-10-27-JEC-to-McCabe-FBI-Alleged-Conflict-of-Interest-due-11-10.pdf
Can Hitlery being gotten so careless to leave a trail of bribery..Gotta track the travels of McCabe next week.
“She routinely forwarded emails from her state.gov account to either her clintonemail.com or her yahoo.com account,” the agents wrote. Why? “So she could print them” at home and not at her State Department office.
========================================
The cover story used.....Huma was only forwarding the emails home so
she could print them, b/c Hillary wanted it that way, even though it's illegal.
REALITY CHECK: Tens of thousands of classified emails are housed,
not only on Hillary's secret basement server, but at Huma’s home as well.....
on devices held by Huma's unemployed husband.
===========================================
This underlines Judiciary Chair Sen Grassley's point that Huma Abedin may have been collecting political intelligence gleaned from unsuspecting State Dept officials that was then sold..... for a price.
Recall that Huma was a govt employee at the State Dept. Then Hillary facilitated Huma having several other jobs simultaneously. (a) Huma working for Teneo....the powerhouse company that is purported to be the vehicle foreign entities use to get access to the Clintons. (b) Clinton Foundation employee. (c) State Dept employee.
Sen Grassley wrote in a June 13, 2015 letter:
It appears that one of Abedin’s clients, the Clinton-connected Teneo Strategies, may have been compensating Ms. Abedin for gathering information from US government sources for the purpose of informing investment decisions of her consulting clients - or in other words, political intelligence.
This raises important questions about whether Abedin’s dual role was adequately disclosed to government officials who may have provided her information without realizing that she was being paid by private investors to gather information.
Grassley’s letter recounted:
<><> Abedin allegedly sent or received more than 7,000 emails on her US government account that involved Teneo’s Doug Band, a close confidante and travel companion of the globe-trotting Bill Clinton;
<><> one email exchange involved Teneo’s Doug Band pressuring Abedin to encourage her State Department boss, Hillary Clinton, to facilitate a White House appointment for one of his clients. Judith Rodin, then-president of the Rockefeller Foundation, “donated hundreds of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation,” Mr. Band allegedly noted in his email to Ms. Abedin.
<><> email evidence allegedly suggests that Ms. Abedin and another Hillary aide, Cheryl Mills, colluded to find a way to ensure the US govt paid for Ms. Abedin’s travel to and from New York.
<><> multiple allegations received by Sen Grassley’s Judiciary Committee indicated Abedin had actually taken leave during her time as a govt employee, casting doubt on whether Abedin should have received $33,000 in taxpayer money.
As joshua c posted: Gee, I am only guessing here, but there may be a reason why you cannot print from a State Dept secure system that has classified information.
The AppleID was used to setup the iPad. . . so that it could share their family data. When he set up his emails on the iPad, I am also wiling to bet he also set up her email on it. Therefore, their two emails are sharing the AppleID for archiving data. Voila. His and her data will be on both. It's a common practice among couples.
They did state they shared the Notebook. . . and if they did not bother to set a separate Apple ID for his or her separate user partition. . . it is a natural consequence of not doing that.
And maybe they never will. Imagine the power struggle games going on behind the scenes right now.
Carlos Danger needed a little insurance? Might be helpful in a plea bargain for no jail time on his sexual predator charges.
He doesn’t look like a guy who would do time in prison well.
“If she used his computer once and didn’t kill the password for her e-mail - it’s all there.”
Time Magazine’s whatever of the year ought to be email. For now it’s caught Hillary and her accomplices. What else is out there?
Her hubby is a snake. He was downloading her emails.
I’ve known jealous husbands who’ve done that. It doesn’t usually end well.
Outlook setting: “Leave a copy of messages on server”
Danger hacked his wife’s account. Downloaded and read her emails.
That’s was one of the first things I thought.
Now we can start hearing, this was all a set up to upset the election process. Hitlery is an innocent victim. Play the sympathy card. Blah blah blah. Sick to death of the liberals lies, and destruction of this nation.
They all need to go down. Current potus too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.