Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SamAdams76

http://cdn.bipartisanpolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/default/files/2012%20Voter%20Turnout%20Full%20Report.pdf

Turnout in 2008 was D +4.6.
Turnout in 2012 was D +1.6.

ALL the polls are using a bad turnout model, some worse than others.


31 posted on 10/29/2016 6:11:38 AM PDT by LNV (It's not a theory if they're really conspiring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: LNV
Turnout in 2008 was D +4.6.
Turnout in 2012 was D +1.6.

Your citation conflicted with others I have read, so I went to look at the report.

You are misreading the numbers on page 6. That is not a measurement of party ID.

That is the percentage of eligible voters that voted for the Democrat or Republican candidate.

THIS is the party ID breakdown, over the past couple of decades:


37 posted on 10/29/2016 6:32:30 AM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: LNV

-Turnout in 2008 was D +4.6.
Turnout in 2012 was D +1.6.

(http://cdn.bipartisanpolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/default/files/2012%20Voter%20Turnout%20Full%20Report.pdf)


You are misreading that pdf. That is % of Party turnout, not % of Electorate.

Dems had a +6% in share of electorate.

http://ropercenter.cornell.edu/polls/us-elections/how-groups-voted/how-groups-voted-2012/


40 posted on 10/29/2016 6:39:21 AM PDT by sunrise_sunset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson