Posted on 10/28/2016 8:01:49 PM PDT by dixiechick2000
Both have some standards and both are beneath each other's standards.
I thought the testimony of one spouse against the other was basically inadmissible in court. I'm not a lawyer though, so I defer to you.
Any communications between spouses are privileged from use only if they have not been overheard by others.
In that event the privilege is destroyed.
“Overheard” would include, I suppose, publishing them in e-mails.
That’s what I think, too. A reptile like carlos danger would not fare well in the joint
I am not a lawyer either....but I think you cannot compel them to testify.
from the internet.
” Testimonial privilege: in criminal cases, one spouse may refuse to testify against his/her defendant spouse. The witness spouse alone may choose to waive the privilege. 2) Communications privilege: in both criminal and civil cases, communications between spouses during the marriage are privileged.”
it was sweet to see that asshat have to resign, but who would have guess he was the gift that would just keep on giving?
Ahh. That second one is a biggie in this case.
I don’t think Huma is going to be smoking Weiner any time soon.
It’s kind of odd that they found huma’s messages while investigating his charges.
There would be no reason to open them.
Would it be legal. I dont know.
I live here but I dont know the usual punishment dished out in NY for this kind of thing. But even in liberal quarters things involving kids hits people in the gut.
“In that event the privilege is destroyed.
Overheard would include, I suppose, publishing them in e-mails.”
That sounds plausible.
Do you know why I use email, and have for years?
To shop, so my inbox is full of spam! They would be hard pressed to use that against me. ;o)
“it was sweet to see that asshat have to resign, but who would have guess he was the gift that would just keep on giving?”
I know! Right?
Awesome day!
If he did he is dead meat unless kept in close protective custody. The Clintons kill people who are about to get embarrassing politically and I don’t think they worry terribly if they have to have it done publicly, even. they have got the deeds done publicly before.
That is balancing two paths of self preservation, both risky. He might just hang himself in his place of protective custody.
There is some kind of poetic justice that it is wiener that is going to cause all of it to come crashing down..
I met Andrew at a Tea Party event in Tucson several years ago. He was really a warm, sincere guy. His legacy lives on.
bump
I agree and would like to think that these events that are happening are the result of a well planned mission of payback to those who arranged and abetted his murder.
That thought made me tingle. ;o)
I hope andrew is watching ALL of the fruits of his labor, but this is one ironic fruit!
No kidding? You are such a fortunate and blessed person.
Keep those memories close...
I actually got to see and hear him speak when he came to Tucson for one of our many Tea Party events. He was great!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.