Posted on 10/26/2016 2:02:00 PM PDT by mdittmar
Lily was on C-Span and talked about education policy why the educators are saying that Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump’s 2016 candidacy is contributing to a rise in school bullying,the “Trump effect.” She responded to telephone calls and electronic communications. Check it out!
(Excerpt) Read more at lilysblackboard.org ...
The left organizes anti-Trump violence, verbally berates and insults anyone who supports Trump, trashes Trump signs and vandalizes things having to do with Trump. Yet Trump is the one inducing more bullying. Gotcha.
There are so many “educators” who are child abusers. They have no sense of professional responsibility or sense of ethics. They attempt to brainwash their students with their brain-addled LIB ideas.
Damnable lie.
Liberals are sick bastards.
Yes, the "Trump effect" will save our nation. That's why I'm voting for Donald Trump!
I see a rise in women nowadays acting like heartless, entitled witches. I call it “the Hillary effect”.
>> educators are saying that Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump’s 2016 candidacy is contributing to a rise in school bullying,the “Trump effect.”
Yeah....Progressive educators bullying parents and students who are conservative.
She failed to discuss the “Hillary effect” where rich silent partners pay poy and needy people to beat up, burn, trash, vandalized and break into unsuspecting people who have different views or values. Soros, the Billionaire, pays thugs to terrorize those who are non-Hillary supporters
The gibberish of modern “educators”.
AFL-CIO/NEA Labor Solidarity Partnership
Does this mean “Blackl Lives Matters” wins the next Nobel Peace prize?
Blame those being bullied is the Dem way. So who’s really being bullied and is there really a sudden increase that can be attributed to Trump?
“According to the studies, in 2003 only 7.1 percent of students reported being bullied. In 2005 that number jumped to 28.1 and in 2007 it soared to a whopping 31.7 percent. “
http://students.com.miami.edu/netreporting/?page_id=1269
” African American youth tended to be less likely than their white counterparts to indicate that they were bullied “
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054139X08001055
(2013) “Females are bullied more often (24%) than males (16%)...The most likely student to get bullied was a white female in the 9th grade”
“the bully or the victim who was most likely to be dangerously violent by measuring four violence-related behaviors...Carrying a weapon in the last 30 days”
http://center4research.org/violence-risky-behavior/z-other-violence/bullying-and-violence/
“sexual minority youth are..•1.7 times more likely to report being threatened or injured with a weapon, or otherwise assaulted as compared to their peers”
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/06/110622162318.htm
>>Yeah....Progressive educators bullying parents and students who are conservative.<<
Yeah those nanny state tools are the real bullies. Everything those utopian dreamers want always have the threat force built into them. Mark Levin has a term for it: Soft tyranny.
I think the single biggest form of bullying by the govt is their interference with the natural order of the family. Think about how the force of law has destroyed families that used to be almost wholly intact. Thanks to many different state laws and influences, the family is crumbling apart. The low income section of the country is hardest hit as the state actively pays for bastard children and promptly remove such bennies (and tax that family) if the mother were to marry the father. At the other end, the state has given itself the authority to end a marriage. Even if such marriage was done religiously. Imo a religious marriage shouldn’t be subject to the state dissolving it.
Unfortunately I think the nanny staters enjoy the breakdown of the family as it suits their purposes. Thus they degenerates through and through.
What about the Muslim effect: When the 1828 election rolled around, a lot of people were terrified when they heard Andrew “Old Hickory” Jackson was running. If you’re wondering how a guy we’re calling a bad ass got such a lame nickname, it’s because he used to carry a hickory cane around and beat people senseless with it, and if you’re wondering why he did that, it’s because he was a fucking lunatic.
Former Democratic Senator and Secretary of the Treasurey Albert Gallatin feared a Jackson presidency because of his “habitual disregard of laws and constitutional provisions.” Or in other words, the man was a loose canon—17th Century Washigton’s answer to Martin Riggs. Sure, he probably didn’t have an irate black lieutenant to answer to, or a weary partner who was too old for this shit, but he most certainly had a death wish.
How do we know? Well, despite everyone’s best efforts, Jackson was elected to the top office, and when he wasn’t busy shaping the Presidency as we know it today, you could find him out back dueling. In case you haven’t been to the 18th century lately, this unmanly sounding activity actually involves standing across from an armed man and shooting at him while he in turn shoots at you. The number of duels that Jackson took part in varies depending on what source you consult; some say 13, while others rank the number somewhere in the 100’s, both of which are entirely too many times for a reasonable human being to stand in front of someone who is trying to kill them with a loaded gun.
On one occasion, he challenged a man named Charles Dickinson to a duel, (the reason behind it wasn’t important, not to us and certainly not to Jackson), and Jackson was even kind enough to give Dickinson the first shot. We’re gonna go ahead and repeat that: In a duel with pistols, Jackson politely volunteers to be shot at first. Dickinson happily obliged and shot Jackson, who proceeded to shake it off like it was a bee sting. When Jackson returned the favor, Dickinson was not so lucky, and that’s why his face isn’t on the twenty. The bullet, by the by, remained in Jackson’s body for 19 years because, we assume, Jackson knew that time spent removing the bullets would just fall under the general category of “time not dueling,” Jackson’s least favorite category.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.