Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

“How do they propose to “crack down” on something that is perfectly legal?”

They’ll find a way to make it illegal. They’ll probably try to impose “fairness doctrine” rules first.


7 posted on 10/24/2016 11:02:56 AM PDT by vladimir998 (Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: vladimir998

I was thinking hate speech.


32 posted on 10/24/2016 11:24:42 AM PDT by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: vladimir998
Matt Mackowiak, Republican president of the Washington-based Potomac Strategy Group, advocated for more proactive measures. "You can put pressure on advertisers and corporations that run them. You can directly or indirectly limit the access of elected officials to them.

"We need to get to a point where Hannity only has paid contributors on. He doesn't need to have elected officials on," Mackowiak said. "Someone needs to be making sure that if you want to go open $50,000 [in ads] on Breitbart, that there is, that you get a phone call that follows that up and makes clear you're not helping."


38 posted on 10/24/2016 11:27:03 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: vladimir998; BenLurkin

When Hillary stacks the Supreme Court with 3 more liberals, the only things that will be illegal will be things the DNC opposes. The Supreme Court will be able to dispense with oral arguments and simply receive DNC press releases...


41 posted on 10/24/2016 11:32:44 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (We're a nation of infants, ruled by their emotion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson