Posted on 10/24/2016 12:10:50 AM PDT by BlessedBeGod
|
|
10/24 |
10/23 |
Change |
|
Trump |
43.8 |
44.4 |
- . 6 |
|
Clinton |
45.1 |
44.1 |
+ 1.0 |
(Excerpt) Read more at cesrusc.org ...
It is sponsored by the LA Slimes that’s strike one and strike two. The NY Slimes a few days ago complained about this poll to pressure the west coast Slimes to submit so strike three.
Lol. Sports announcers do the same thing. “Team X can win the game today with a strong performance on both the offensive and defensive sides.” Genius.
Here, have some hope: It’s the Turnout, Maybe (American Thinker)
They were going to show Trump down anyway. What the NYT said was just an excuse to do so.
It’s a tie. Very few undecideds on who to vote for and whether or not to vote.
For 2 weeks, the battle is the effects of new O’Keefe/Assange/Anonymous vs Voter Fraud.
1 is not outside margin of error. Still essentially tied but he should be way ahead. This poll had him leading for some time. The speech at Gettysburg apparently didn’t help but it was not well covered. FOX did not cover it in its entirety and the rest essentially ignored it.
That’s about the only thing sports announcers ever say. They just keep changing the stock phrases and jargon.
Equally meaningless: the “interviews” with the coach and players.
Completely correct!
I’m talking about the trend line for the last 6 weeks.
It bothers me.
Me too.
As of September, her SuperPACs had way more money than Trump’s. Her campaign cash was only slightly ahead.
The media is going to be hammering Trump for 2 weeks straight with any negative stories they can, or just ignoring him if there’s nothing negative. If she is also able to outspend him in ads by a wide margin then it’s hard to see how he gets his poll numbers up. I think he needs to bite the bullet and dump another $100m of his own money into the campaign, and maybe do one of those half hour TV infomercial things like Perot did a few days before the vote. He’s a showman and an entertainer. He should be able to use that advantage to produce a program people will actually want to watch.
If we’re going to beat them at their own game, then we should have push polls out there smearing Hillary. No use complaining about the other side’s tactics when we can’t stop them but can do the same thing.
Their true colors...
Polls are stupid, and you can’t actually prove they made the phone calls.
“discredited”
If your evidence is that NY Times article that has been debunked numerous times I’ll say you’re discredited.
This poll has been pretty good in the past. This is quite a swing. Not the norm. Something doesn’t seem right.
Based on the 0.1-0.2% daily swings over the past week or so, a full 2% swing is huge
A group from church that I work with was 50/50 in Sep. today 100% Trump. She whose name shall not be spoken has such high negatives that even die hard dems are walking away. Keep the faith baby!
I agree. If this were a typical election cycle, I would feel much more discouraged. IN 2012, I felt like the election was lost before I went to the polls, and I was just going through the motions.
Media and other polls and the effect they have on voters perception of the race is clearly shown in this poll. A month ago, Clinton was 5 points ahead of respondents when queried as to the predicted winner. Now, she leads in this category by 20.
Pray that this deluge of bad news all over the media doesn’t suppress the normally not voting Trump supporters we are counting on to shock the world. It’s clear that this is the intention of ridiculous polls like yesterdays ABC poll.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.