Soros said that he expects Trump to win the popular vote by a landslide but to lose the electoral vote. To me that says that they will use the same scheme that got Obama his second term: cheat in the heavily-democrat precincts of critical toss-up states. Either that, or bribe electors to vote against their popular vote winner.
I only read the headline, but it said that Trump’s people say they’re losing. I presume that would be in the electoral votes. Poll-watchers will be critical. And especially to get video footage of suspected foul play, such as poll-watchers being kicked out and boxes of ballots being brought in.
“Soros said that he expects Trump to win the popular vote by a landslide but to lose the electoral vote. To me that says that they will use the same scheme that got Obama his second term: cheat in the heavily-democrat precincts of critical toss-up states. Either that, or bribe electors to vote against their popular vote winner.”
“..so it will be reported a close race clear up to the finish line.”
Excellent summary caww. I believe there’s one more reason they want to keep reporting it as a close race to the very last minute, and that is so when the inevitable accusations of fraud start making the front page, the genuine fraud will be easier to hide.
There will be very obvious cases of voter fraud in certain areas, such as the traditional ones (can I say that yet?) where there’s more votes cast than registered voters, or the areas where EVERY single registered voter went for Hillary. There’s no chance the GOP arm of the Uniparty will investigate any of it since they have made it clear they don’t have a dog in this fight. But unlike Willard, if (God forbid) Trump was to lose, I DO believe he will spend plenty of his own money hiring crews to expose the fraud in those areas and try to get either the ‘real’ results, or have the fraudulent votes disqualified.
However, these obvious cases of fraud will primarily serve as a distraction from the massive, nationwide, fraud that will be going on right under everyone’s noses, and will only be exposed by chance and in very limited circumstances. Again, I hope I’m wrong, but this widespread fraud will be through the use of the electronic voting tabulating machines, when either before the polls open, or perhaps even during Election Day where a data chip is inserted into the tabulator, the machines will be re-programmed to change only just enough votes from Trump to Hillary, to make it appear as it was a VERY close race. There’s now quite a few videos out there that do an excellent job at showing how the vote tabulating machines can be rigged, but I like this one best: http://dennismichaellynch.com/really-happening-votes/ The need to have the polls show in advance that it’s a very close race only serves to condition the public in advance to the fraudulent “very close” results, close enough to not give the appearance of obvious fraud.
Every time I see recent photos or videos of Hillary and see the confidence within her (other than the anger and rage someone occasionally captures, which is just her true nature being exposed), I can only conclude that she exhibits that genuine self assurance because she has been directly told to not worry, that the Uniparty oligarchy has it under control. I sincerely hope I am wrong, and I am doing everything I possibly can to combat fraud and to get people to vote for Trump, but IF Hillary supposedly wins, it will be because of this electronic voter fraud. One other thought... All those early an absentee votes are the easiest to manipulate because in most cases there are not the standard/usual election clerks, judges, poll watchers, and poll challengers available to keep an eye on those ballots. I am a strong advocate of voting only on Election Day when at all possible.