'Rigged' Debates? Questions Arise Again Over Lighted Screen At Hillary's Podium

Zero Hedge.com ^ | Oct. 22 2016 | Zero Hedge

[Progressives suck]

'Rigged' Debates? Questions Arise Again Over Lighted Screen At Hillary's Podium

by Tyler Durden Oct 22, 2016 4:55 PM

After the first debate, numerous videos surfaced alleging that Hillary was using some sort of teleprompter built into her podium to assist with answering questions or to offset whatever medical condition she's dealing with. The videos were largely dismissed as "cooky alt-right conspiracy theories" and didn't get much attention outside of those spheres.

But, when similar abnormalities surfaced on Hillary's podium in the third debate, combined with the fact that she spent an awkward amount of time during her answers peering down rather than at the camera, we grew a bit more curious.

With that said, here is a video analyzing the abnormalities from debate 1. Notice that around 18 seconds into this video one can very clearly see a light shut off on Hillary's podium even though there is no such light at Trump's podium.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=os5fe-ADtZA

Rest is here:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-21/hillary-debate-podium

[philman_36]

Some people have more or less photographic recall.

Well that rules her out as she "can't recall" numerous things under oath.

Or did she flat out lie...again...multiple times?

[tumblindice]

All I’m saying is that if a lot of people were saying while watching the debate that it looked like Shrillary was reading, then maybe she was reading.
I’m not at all sure why some here are rushing to her defense. She’s got Uniparty, the MSM and the stupid half of the country to carry her water. Take a break, Gungas ...

[RonnG]

I recall during the 3rd debate, she was peering down at her podium while speaking and just was a brief moment stopped in mid-sentence and quietly uttered to herself what sounded like “ Oh No!” Did anyone else catch that?

[HiTech RedNeck]

Or... photographically/phonographically remembering what she had studied?

[bicyclerepair]

Can’t bear the sight or sound of this corrupt beast. It’s so frustrating watching criminals rule this country.

[Nevadan]

Re: . This morning they said on Fox that since she was so far ahead that she was going to take more time off. We shall see.

Really? I can’t imagine any candidate taking time off weeks before an election, no matter how far ahead they are. That would be the the time to really go for it! Go for the landslide to beat all other landslides. Make it an historical event of multiple proportions: The first woman president in US history, who wins by the largest landslide ever, destroys the Republican Party once and for all, returns triumphantly to the WhiteHouse with her husband, a former president in tow. Unless you’ve got health problems....

[HiTech RedNeck]

Heh heh heh... actually that isn’t impossible.

[HiTech RedNeck]

Just pointing out a possible “robotic” way of remembering stuff that even she didn’t halfway believe in. She envisioned reading it or hearing it.

[HiTech RedNeck]

I think even she has trouble believing in herself. She’s a puppet.

[TomGuy]

It was obvious she was often looking at the podium and reading answers. My wife pointed it out throughout the debate.

I posted a comment in the live thread at about the 30-minute mark about her constantly glancing down at the podium -- as if reading.

Throughout, she had noticeable hesitant moments where she acted as if she was either reading something or was listening to someone.

[HiTech RedNeck]

I’ll go for the hypothesis that it was happening in her head, since Donald’s folks actually did get to look at her special podium and there was no actual screen. It was a mental recall trick.

[TomGuy]

I recall during the 3rd debate, she was peering down at her podium while speaking and just was a brief moment stopped in mid-sentence and quietly uttered to herself what sounded like “ Oh No!” Did anyone else catch that?

I didn't catch it. But I tuned out about about the 1-hour mark.

[longtermmemmory]

notice how she has to campaign WITH kaine? He essentially has to prop her up and then she leans on her speech.

During her speeches, look at her eyes. Her body language screams “I am lying”.

[Nevadan]

I disagree. I think she is beyond believing in herself. She feels entitled. As for her being a puppet, I don't think she sees it that way. I think she is greedy for power and money and is beholden to her donors in order to keep the flow of money and power. But she believes she is in control. She has no problems with self confidence. She is superior to the rest of us. She is an arrogant, haughty, conceited, contemptuous woman whose hubris knows no bounds.

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

It doesn’t matter. The entire reason for the institution of the “debates” is to induce a “gaffe” in the Republican candidate.

Without that objective, there is no reason for the prohibition against notes, or even a notebook.

Without that objective, there is no reason for the moderator. A chess timer to control the microphones to equalize the time is all that would be needed.

We know that that will not happen, because the journoLIBs and DemoLIBs will collude to prevent it.

[arrogantsob]

Trump did not have his light turned on. His podium would have looked the same as her had he wanted it.

The podiums were the same except one had a pile of shite standing behind it.

[deport]

All I’m saying is that if a lot of people were saying while watching the debate that it looked like Shrillary was reading, then maybe she was reading.
\
****************

If you look real close at some of the You Tubes you’ll note that Hillary is making notes
with pen/paper. One of the reasons she’s looking down at the desk top. Trump would
say something she’d pick up her pen and write.

[arrogantsob]

That was a water glass.

[Calvin Locke]

I can’t imagine any candidate taking time off weeks before an election...

But she's a Dem. She's HRC. She's entitled.

Anybody else, "Gee, it looks like they're not interested in winning. They're just going through the motions."

[HiTech RedNeck]

No, I disagree.

I perceive she believes in an evil parody of salvation. Which is NOT believing in herself.