Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: unixfox

I’m not sure what exactly Ford proved by pardoning Nixon. Would it have held up in court? If you consider the implications of a blanket presidential pardon, then it would be possible for the chief executive to create a whole cadre of immune criminals who would no longer have to obey any federal law or pay taxes. The idea seems preposterous on its face.


33 posted on 10/23/2016 8:20:20 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: SoCal Pubbie

Hmm, so if Trump issued a blanket pardon then no American would have to pay federal taxes or worry about Federal law.

Seeing some possibilities here.


35 posted on 10/23/2016 8:28:42 AM PDT by agere_contra (ISIS in Mosul are not being defeated. They are being redeployed to attack the people of Syria.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: SoCal Pubbie

Ford’s pardon of Nixon was never challenged in court, and it was tacitly implied that if it was challenged, Ford would still be president for a few years and would just pardon Nixon for any convictions anyway, so the issue was left alone. In my opinion, a presidential blanket pardon isn’t ‘settled law’ at all, and the elephant in the room has just been ignored for forty years.


63 posted on 10/23/2016 1:14:07 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson