Trump promises to sue accusers after election

The Washington Examiner ^ | October 22, 2016 | Robert King

[kevcol]

Donald Trump promised to sue every single woman who accused him of sexual misconduct after the election is over, and blamed the media for using the allegations to attack his campaign.

"Every woman lied when they came forward to hurt my campaign, total fabrication. The events never happened, never," he said during a rally in Gettysburg, Pa., on Saturday.

[nickedknack]

Hmmm...making unsubstantiated/false sexual assault claims, coordinated & launched by Hillary operatives, in the closing weeks of a presidential campaign is pretty much the definition of malicious.

[Hot Tabasco]

He’s not going to “sue his accusers” because he’s a public figure UNLESS he can show that deliberate lies were published with MALICE, then he has a case.

I'm quite sure he was talking about the actual women themselves.........

[McGruff]

How dare him fight back. /sarc

Republicans don’t do that.

[nickedknack]

Agree. Fuchs News is galloping to the Left — didn’t take long after the bimbo news readers forced out Ailes.

[peeps36]

Let's see how fast the Clinton's run away from these useful idiots after the election. I don't know how anyone can believe these politically motivated attacks on Trump. These women didn't say anything for years but they come out two weeks before a presidential election
No way. I hope people can see through the Clinton smears and see the truth. Hillary Clinton belongs underneath the big-house, not in the white house.

[Timpanagos1]

Questions in a deposition can be wide ranging and when you are deposed, you are sworn.

[justlurking]

He’s not going to “sue his accusers” because he’s a public figure UNLESS he can show that deliberate lies were published with MALICE, then he has a case.

I don't think it will be hard to prove malice.

All of the accusations were timed to undermine his campaign. That's practically the definition of malice.

[RKBA Democrat]

Good. About time our side fought back. Hard.

[amihow]

Well is it malice enough to go public when victim is running for election? What other non malicious motive could they have?

[DallasSun]

Absolutely. I agree.

[bgill]

The treat alone may cause some of them to admit to their wrong doings and give up names of those who put them up to it. Remember, one has already fled the country.

[Fresh Wind]

[Gideon7]

CBS is saying this is an attempt to intimidate and scare his victims into staying silent.

[Hot Tabasco]

You need a legitimate case, or you are wasting your time, money and credibility.

I think he has plenty of all you mentioned..........

He's got a bottomless purse and a legal team with all the time in the world............

[Balding_Eagle]

What do you mean by that? That Trump would be scared of the questions?

LOL!

Donald’s not scared of anything, but he is determined, damned determined, that he is going to end this cycle of corruption in our election process.

[No Socialist]

“Sue their accusers AND their lawyers.”

And the DNC, and the Clinton Campaign, and the media shills and everyone else remotely connected.

Trump has spent 100 Million of his own money on this election. That payback for damages is going to hurt.

[Rusty0604]

I flipped to CNN and was surprised they actually aired the entire speech. Afterward, him calling the accusers liars and using them was declared the headline of the speech.

[stanne]

People are very poorly advised to go against Trump. I like him, so it comes easy to me. I also see him as a winner so that part’s easy, too. Plus I see him as the non-schmoozer-extraordinaire, so easy to see why to just be quiet if I’d have to work with him in the future. He’s the kind of winner that has zero time for anyone not with him. To say the least

[Luircin]

It’s the right thing to do.

Drain the swamp. It might not be popular; it might not conform to conventional wisdom; it might not be be seen as ‘nice.’

But it’s the right thing to do.

End of story.