Yesterday, I went to ten major media entities, NYT, LAT, WP, BG, etc. Out of all of those, only two had ANYTHING on their home page. Of the two (and the NYT was one) they had a pissy little lukewarm “below the fold” byline article. It had so little specifics to it.
When you go on today to the NYT homepage, where do you think that little, obscure article is on their home page?
I’ll tell you: nowhere. You can scour their home page and not even find a single reference or mention of the perps, Veritas, the videos...anything. Nothing.
Now, does that mean they aren’t “reporting” it? Of course not. If you are focused and know how, you can find it.
Just like the retractions that the NYT prints on its slanderous articles that come out on page 16 (if that fishwrap is even that long anymore) behind the want ads, next to the songbird sightings in upstate New York, that encompass two sentences of disembodied retraction.
So I would disagree with you. As another poster said, if they print one line or paragraph, they can ignore it after that and say they covered it.