Posted on 10/20/2016 12:22:04 PM PDT by ColdOne
At the end of the debate, while Hillary was droning on with snippets rehearsed, Trump gave the best description of Hillary. He said, "Such a nasty woman." Who could disagree with that? She is nasty and a woman.
On substance and manner, Trump was clearly the winner. Hillary gave her usual robotic answers sprinkled with cheap shots, which is her preparation for the past week.
Trump brought out that the violence at his rally in Chicago and other rallies was caused by operatives of the Clinton campaign. Hillary did not deny it.
On the Middle East disaster in Syria, Iraq, Iran, and Libya, Trump clearly stated that Obama and Hillary, as secretary of state, caused the disaster by withdrawing from Iraq without leaving a force. Hilary did not deny it.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
NASSSSTIE HOBBITSSSSESSSS YSSSSSS MY PRECIOUSSSSSS!!!!!
Maybe harridude?
Hillary had said under her plan Trump’s contribution to Social Security would go up unless he finds a way to get out of it. He replied, “Such a Nasty Woman.”
If Trump said she’s fat, she’s fat.
If trump said she’s beautiful, she’s beautiful.
If trump said she’s stupid, she’s stupid.
If Trump said she’s smart, she’s smart.
And if Trump said she’s nasty, she’s nasty.
My mother is a die hard liberal. I talked to her today, she said she watched the last two debates, and said she can’t stand Hillary. IF she votes she’ll vote for Trump. I am glad I was setting down. I remember her telling me she would never support a Republican. I think we have a strong chance.
“I’ve been here since November of 1998.”
OK. Then welcome back. With nearly eighteen years of experience in watching, then discussing her serial misdeeds here on FR no one should have to explain to you why Trump called her what she is: a nasty woman.
IMHO he should say it every chance he gets, especially as the appalling e-mails come to light in the days to come.
None of the GOP also-rans would have the brass balls to say something like that: what we all think.
Anywho, if you were wondering that’s why he’s the presumptive president and the cuckservative nevertrump loosers are oath-breaking also-rans second-guessing, criticizing and backstabbing him.
LOL!
The Harridan and The Harridude!
I like it!
Well, since they are not going to win the election, it is a moot point.
IIRC, Hitlery the Harridan selected Kaine the Harridude a year or so ago, and kept up the pretense of looking for a VP candidate just to keep the drive by media chattering.
Trump’s ability to hire smart, competent people may be his strongest character trait!
Hitlery the Harridan is certainly venemous.
Well played!
I’ll include your most excellent find in my future references to Hitlery!
I get it. It’s just the phrase. I’ve not heard it used about her before. And he seemed to use it a lot. It was just that at one point she was saying something pretty tame and he interjected with the phrase. I just thought that was odd.
Not a big deal, really, I was just throwing my gut reaction in about it. And yeah, I definitely think she is a nasty woman, but I prefer more objective words like Liar, dishonest, incompetent, etc. “Nasty”, like “scumbag”, is just too subjective for me, personally.
I figured Kaine was chosen to serve as Hillary’s impeachment insurance.
He surely wasn’t meant to be an actual VP, was he?
################
I think you are right, but she has one foot in the grave and the other on a banana peel right now. If she is elected, we will end up with President Kreepy Klown Kaine by the end of the first (and hopefully never) term.
She is dying, and that office ages people horribly, even that disengaged sloth, Hussein.
“The ones closest to her know it best. I don’t understand why anyone would continue working for someone who flies into rages and calls people names. Is being close to power so important to them?”
Yes. There is also the creepily uncomfortable fact for freedom lovers that there is a significant plurality of humanity who wish to be submissive, compliant and controlled. They get turned on by their own powerlessness and dependency, and enjoy an endless status as minor dependent. It is a sickness. Look at the Western women who whore to Islam.
“I remember her telling me she would never support a Republican. I think we have a strong chance.”
Our advantage is in part that he is not a Republican. He is something different. Something new.
That question nags at me as well. Have they all sold their soul to evil and just accept that treatment? It's sick to me.
Hilda proved her nastiness when her bus unloaded on the streets of Georgia. Vile and nasty to be precise.
Well, I have different ideas of where the Western-women-turning-Muslim comes from; for many, especially young women, I think it’s just like any other case of people needing to validate themselves by being different and getting noticed; I think it’s a kind of exhibitionism and rebellion.
But the psychology behind your ‘plurality’ is also a sickness.
When it comes to someone like Donna Brazile, if the story we’ve heard is true, I can only see it as a desire to be close to power and to keep making money, no matter what. Even if these people were truly ideological, it would take a pretty materialistic person to keep putting up with that kind of abuse. They seem to sell-out their self-respect entirely: Brazile was a stuttering, pitiful fool, in that interview with Kelly; and she has only herself to blame for being a lackey for such unscrupulous people.
(One of the comments to the article: “I’m an original Never Trump guy ... but this is an example of the sleaze that is part of everything the Clintons touch ...”)
My ol’ Granny always used to say, “Show me your company, and I’ll tell you who you are.”
It seems especially sick, when you consider what a mediocre ‘leader’ the Democrats’ current standard-bearer is.
Maybe some of them started out with ideals, and are just old and tired and can’t disengage from a party that has become vicious, shallow and downright stupid.
(I had to laugh recently, when I learned that the Texas district once represented by Barbara Jordan is now represented by none other than...Sheila Jackson Lee ;-)
He should and could have backed up the assertion with quotes from all the Wikileaks and FBI docs - Podesta saying her “instincts” are bad, somebody else saying her inability to acknowledge and apologize for mistakes is a “character flaw”, Secret Service agents refusing to work for her and requesting transfers because of how contemptuous and rude she is, agents laughing behind her back when she broke her elbow, and on and on........
She is the nastiest, meanest, liar of any woman I have ever heard of.
Stoopid bitch! ..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.