And she was reading her responses to all the questions like a flipping Robot.
Nothing new here.
Maybe she could do us all a favor and just stroke out.
This is how it is. Hillary bought the DNC nomination, and she no doubt paid off the moderators to get the questions in advance. This is who she is. She has never ever done anything honestly.
One has to ask Donald,
1) Why did you keep going to those rigged sessions and
2) Why didn’t you use your influence to get a truly impartial setting and have an ACTUAL debate with Hilary.
I don’t know that Trump’s tweet is specifically claiming that she had answers last night.
WikiLeaks has already proven that she had them in prior debates.
Was it Donna Brazille? Again?
MSM=traitors to the people, traitors to the Republic.
Remember the days before Wikileaks when we had to believe everything the mainstream media told us, and to do otherwise made you a crazy conspiracy theorist? So glad those days are gone.
No, he was referring to the Wikileaks revelation that Donna Brazil gave Clinton one or more of the questions before one of her debates with Sanders.
I also believe that she had the questions beforehand last night, because her responses are too well rehearsed. The only two that caught her off guard is the ones about the pay for play in the Clinton Foundation, and the “open borders” comment during one of her paid speeches.
He brought this up during today’s rally and I definitely got the impression that he was not referring to last night.
He was talking about the questions that Hilary got from Donna Brazile at the Sanders Debates.
He mentioned the Megyn interview of her last night. Geez.
Could only watch a couple of minutes of the “debate,” but it sure looked like the witch was constantly glancing down and queuing or reading during her responses.....
Could have been Parkinsonism, but not a doctor.
KYPD
Her supposed “closing statement” which closing statement was supposedly “sprung” on both nominees, came out well rehearsed, as did most of her answers. How is she avoiding prosecution for all the criminal activity she is involved in and being freely disclosed?
I wanted Trump to point blank ask wallace if she had the questions beforehand... but I wanted Trump to also say some other things he missed.
She was most definitely regurgitating a prepared response.
she also had an ear piece and a teleprompter again
Maybe that’s why she constantly boozed it up overseas as SOS - a good excuse to sound incoherent and unsure of what to say.
Instead of bringing up these allegations, Trump should get to the bottom of these practices and take appropriate action. Just talking about it is not doing the election any good. We all know that Hillary is crooked. Trump does not need to repeat himself time and again.
Almost ALL of her answers were canned responses. She delivered them like she had been coached, but if you break them down, they really didn't say anything.
How many times did she say "she was for women and children"? What does that mean? What, in 30 years has she accomplished for "women and children", other than strongly advocate the brutal and terrible murder of unborn children.
She said she was "for job creation", but gave absolutely no indication of HOW theses mythical jobs would be created, or what they would be.
I do think she was surprised when the WikiLeaks questions came up. Her blabbering responses, especially the "Open Borders" question when she said it was about energy, was neither true, nor coherent.
