Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: IronJack
You're missing the point. They WERE accurate ratings because the investors were bailed out by the U.S. government. In other words, the creditworthiness of the borrowers was irrelevant once the mortgages were packaged into bonds. At the end of the day, it was the creditworthiness of the U.S. government that was the only relevant standard.
32 posted on 10/20/2016 8:33:47 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Go ahead, bite the Big Apple ... don't mind the maggots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

Now that you put it that way ... When the government underwrote the bonds, THEY assumed the risk, so the rating became irrelevant. The government in essence promoted a massive fraud by committing taxpayer money to back up loans that were stupidly risky, all in the name of enfranchising people who had no business being enfranchised.


33 posted on 10/20/2016 9:33:39 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson