So far, it comports with where I think we are independently. Several times I’ve given them numbers and they tell me it is right where they have the state/race.
Now, that may not mean much, but it does mean that I, coming at it from a totally different independent perspective, arrive at the same numbers they are getting.
Sound logic! What you describe, basically, is the way one confirms circumstantial evidence, to establish a trial result—as in conviction on circumstantial evidence. (And I suspect that your conclusion is based upon several, not just one, different perspectives—such as crowds drawn; social media activity, etc..)
Ok. It is rather unbearable not to know what data to trust, especially if the data shows a dead heat. And the numbers change with the latest media generated Trump scandal. This last has me worried if their worst Trump video is released Friday before election. Could it change these numbers *significantly* statistically speaking? Thank you for responding.
“Classified material was obtained through great sacrifice and sometimes lives were given to obtain.
Hillary treats it with the respect her husband afforded to the women he brutally raped.
Harsh analogy but true”.
Posted by HereintheHeartland
Did you see the Arizona Republic/Cronkite poll from AZ today? They were breathless over it earlier on CNN, and it showed Hillary up 4 or 5%. Of course, the internals were like 42% D and 24% R, 54% women, and 56% college graduates! Even with all that, she was still up only 5%, lol. How can they get away with such manipulation? It’s astonishing!