Posted on 10/17/2016 12:06:35 AM PDT by Zakeet
Matt Drudge of the Drudge Report has warned Hillary Clinton that he’s about to drop a bombshell about her "sex stuff" Saturday morning.
"Oh, on the sex stuff. Hillary is about to get hers ...," Drudge said in a tweet.
Drudge tweeted a picture of Clinton on the Ellen DeGeneres Show, where she appeared Friday in her first interview following the second presidential debate with Donald Trump.
The "sex stuff" Drudge is referring to concerns Clinton’s sexuality, which the London Times and several other foreign newspapers brought into question back in 2007 when Clinton was accused of having an affair with her aide Huma Abedin.
The Clinton campaign responded to these reports, saying that the reports were "ridiculous" and not to be taken seriously.
"This does not even qualify as tabloid trash ... it's ridiculous and reckless," a Clinton aide said
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Her followers won’t change. But people just coming into to election might.
HILLARY’S GAY ROOMMATE
May 3, 2004
Rafe Klinger
Since College, Hillary has become a champion of gay and lesbian rights, appearing at a gay Democrats rally in New York in 2000, where she gave lengthy speech.
According to the rumors, Hillary’s alleged lovers included a younger woman who often traveled with her, a popular TV and movie star, the daughter of a top government official and a stunning model who got a career boost after sleeping with Hillary.
A Washington insider says there were stories that Hillary used the presidential retreat at Camp David for romps with her gay friends during the Clinton White House years.
“A witness claimed he was making a night security round when he heard laughter and went to investigate,” says the insider. “He was shocked when he say Hillary and a brunette woman frolicking in the pool and quickly walked away.”
It’s (the file) political dynamite,” says a sources. “Its very, very powerful stuff.”
They say wikileaks also showed there were discussions where she wasn’t sure about gay marriage; so we’ll see.
Good Lord, my 98 year old mother has fewer wrinkles. What is she going to look like in 5 years?
Well the old Baptist ladies who don’t like trump won’t like the lesbian sex and the adultery of Hillary! They may just stay home. It would have an effect!
I dunno if anyone has noticed but sex scandals don’t have any traction with Democrats.
Dead girl, live boy, whatever, these things are resume enhancers for Democrats.
As someone who works in the Security Clearance world, I can assure you that interviewers aren't even permitted to ask directly about sexual orientation anymore, and an applicant being a homosexual, closeted or not, is no longer a disqualifying factor. The current guidelines go out of their way to tell interviewers that they must not treat homosexual relationships any different from heterosexual ones. In fact to accommodate homosexuals, essentially the entire "sexual deviancy" category of security clearance denials has been all but gutted so about the only thing that can keep you from getting a clearance these days is pedophilia (and sadly enough that isn't even automatic denial, I've seen people approved as long as they were honest and were undergoing counseling).
https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/1993/01/12/hillary-the-wellesley-years/OEapzWGuzSNAFiIHL2zm9K/story.html
FROM THE ARCHIVES | JANUARY 12, 1993
Hillary: The Wellesley years
YOUNG REPUBLICAN LEADER
Hillary Rodham plunged immediately into campus activism, winning election to the presidency of the college Young Republicans in her freshman year. She called herself a “Goldwater girl” who, as a high school student in 1964, had passed out literature for conservative Republican presidential candidate Barry Goldwater.
“She started off as a lot of us did as fairly typical daughters of fairly well-to-do families from Republican suburbs,” says Kris Olson Rogers, a classmate who was also politically active at Wellesley and who is now a law professor.
“I don’t think Hillary was ever really conservative except in a fiscal sense,” says her mother. “Her father was extremely conservative in that area.”
Rodham proselytized for the GOP early on, according to a March 1966 article in the Wellesley News. She presided over a panel discussion on the topic of “why be a Republican?” And in the fall of her sophomore year, a News story quotes Rodham as urging fellow students to go to work for Republican candidates. “The girl who doesn’t want to go out and shake hands can type letters or do general office work,” she says. Ironically, the story states that Young Republicans were concentrating their efforts in support of then Massachusetts attorney general Edward Brooke, who was running for the US Senate.
She maintained her GOP connections even well after she had begun to gravitate toward the left. After her junior year -- during which she had campaigned for Democrat Eugene McCarthy in New Hampshire -- she went to Washington as a summer intern, where she was assigned to work as a researcher for Republican House members. That summer of ‘68 she traveled to Miami as a volunteer for Nelson Rockefeller at the Republican convention that nominated Richard M. Nixon.
The image of girl on girl is not exactly a repulsive to us guys but the image of an old, fat, hag rutting away like a pig on girl is a big barf moment.
But it’s not about orientation. It’s about secrecy. If a hetero guy w/clearance is screwing around on his wife on the sly, isn’t that a security issue? It’s about the secrecy.
**************
That sounds like Bill ... He couldn't spend 10 minutes in Haiti despite the $Billions but after the Tsunami he jetted off to Pattaya and Bangkok and never wanted to leave.
And 20 years ago you would have been correct. These days however, about the only thing that can get you denied a clearance regarding adultery is lying to the interviewer or on the polygraph about having (sometimes multiple) affairs. As long as you tell the truth, the assumption is you aren't a threat because you are open and honest about your affairs and therefore can't be blackmailed (many applicant's even claim that they have an "open" relationship with their spouse and the spouse is aware of the affairs). Heck, I've even had some applicants actually brag about how many women (or men) they have on the side. Again, this all goes back to homosexuality, the liberals were so concerned that some gay or lesbian was going to be denied a clearance solely because of their sexual orientation that they essentially gutted the entire "sexual deviancy" category just to protect them.
Well you see, they kinda rub their groins together like two pairs of scissors. It used to be called "frottage". Now, as per Mr. Garrett, it's just called "scissoring".
I would think that previously undisclosed, current marital infidelity (straight or gay) would still raise red flags in a security investigation. At least it did when I had a secret clearance, albeit many years ago. The internal security guys didn’t seem to care about past drug use or sexual improprieties as long as the information was “out there” and the employee was therefore not subject to blackmail. But ongoing infidelity is almost always covert and that was considered a security risk.
especially if it shows bisexuality, everyone will think “oh, that’s because Bill was such a dog.” and isn’t she contemporary
Yes, it was the deception that mattered not (usually) the actual behavior itself. Often, the internal security guys would already have pretty good information about what they were fishing for. One example I recall was a coworker who had gotten a DUI in California. He was suspected to be an alcoholic, but they couldn’t end his career just for that. They had the CA police report and court record, and asked him a fairly innocuous, standard question about “any recent incidents they should know about.” The interviewer caught him being deceptive or dishonest about it, and that’s when his troubles began.
especially if it shows bisexuality, everyone will think “oh, that’s because Bill was such a dog.” and isn’t she contemporary
First of all, does it even seem believable that someone would have sex with her. Secondly, what would that person look like.(barf alert) Thirdly, I assume that person was paid, and therefore would keep his/her/its mouth shut. Fourth, that person/thing will keep quiet so as not to die. Fifth, no one wants to picture her having sex with anybody or anything.
The picture of that would be a horror story.
A lesbian relationship with Huma is troubling, but with Huma being given access to highly classified State Department information and her pillow talk with Hillary as Secretary of State it could be criminal. Remember Gen. Petraous?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.