Posted on 10/16/2016 7:37:17 AM PDT by C19fan
Rigging the election is more important than high ratings.
Pray America wakes
First of all, what is it that you do? In your own words ...
Secondly, how is that "important?" And to whom? To your imaginary friends and your cronies in Manhattan penthouses? Do you really think the average American gives two hoots about your pontifications?
And now that the Wikileaks have shown that you are body and soul a propaganda arm of the lying Left, whatever claim you have to objectivity is void.
I agree with half of your statement: you're easy to hate.
Same here...I watch Hannity ever so often...Dobbs on the other FOX...That’s about it anymore...
Hopefully after her sorry lying rear end is kicked off of the Tube she can spread her “important” message of “Will F___ for Food” on a street-corner.
Good thing I am in a friendly mood this morning.. :-)
No Megyn(stupid spelling), that is electioneering and you are doing it for free, not with a gun to your head like most dictatorships.
Because what she does is the video version of Murdock’s unethical WSJ push polling.
Megan Kelly can look in the mirror and see a person who promoted an inherently dishonest, shamelessly corrupt, impaired and sloppy woman to be President of the United States. Then she can look at her kids and then take her meds.
Whatever a woman says has to be believed…right
What happened to the burden of proof…
It goes both ways…
It is the old lie and then the person has to prove he or she is innocent
It is supposed to be innocent until proven guilty
Country is boomed..
Are kids and grand kids will just be peasants
Hell were all peasants now
Kelly, don’t EVER claim you are reporting news....
You talk nothing but opinion...All the time...
Your “opinion” to me, is worth about as much as a spoonful of dirt...
Actually Williams/Mathews is up against a repeat of O’Reilly so not really a heads up competition. Meghan on the other hand was a LOSER. Where can we find that information on a regular basis? Thanks.
Pimping for Hillary? If Fox News thinks she's their hope for the future, they are themselves at best delusional propagandists-indoctrinators-enablers.
They have rendered the O'Reilly slogan (Fair and Balanced) meaningless.
Ahh. The Bottle Blonde who slept her way to the top wants us to respect her
How cute
You make it sound as if her whole career is merely based on strategic gashing. She obviously can read out loud well, so she does have other “skills”.
Megyn Kelly? Wasn’t she a porn star in the 90s?
Think about it. Fox has been as close as one could get to objective journalism for over a decade. The Rats knew they had to turn Fox Left. They went after Ailes.
Fine. Ailes put them on the map by finding a bunch of attractive females to read teleprompters. Smart but made them vulnerable to the Femonazis. Caving in to the Femonazis was a bad business decision IMHO. They should have kept Ailes and fired the women. Note to the NEXT Fox- fire all the women every year and replace them with new ones.
So, the Rats have succeeded in two of the LONG range goals they have had for years in this cycle. They destroyed Fox which is now just another bad version of MSNBC. They destroyed the GOP. The thing they failed to accomplish and this was not even on their “to do” list was destroy the Tea Party because they thought they had done this already.
So they risked everything, allowed the mask to come off in regard to their collusion with the Brown Shirt Media. The BSM was already into single digit territory. Even they note that cockroaches poll better than journalists. The Rats were willing to sacrifice the strongest weapon they had.
Because they realized too late the ghost of the Tea Party has come back to life and is bigger and stronger and more pissed off than ever they are facing a battle for their very survival and LOSING.
BEST ELECTION EVER!!
Of course MSM goons do an important job. Why do you its the oldest profession?
The graveyards are full of indispensable men.
-deGaulle
Megyn was out to get Trump from the get-go. Many here predicted that she would go after Trump on the women issue. Her statement the day before the debate, “the question is whether this is – actually not to be too grandiose about it – because Fox News is hosting it, and I’m a co-moderator but is this actually, because they have the potential to change the course of history? I mean, one of these guys could be out by 11:00 tomorrow night...” It looks to me that she thought her question would destroy Trump, that he would wither and shrink as other Republicans usually do when faced with accusations of gender, racial,or other bias. But Trump fought back and America cheered him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.