Can we believe the gummit is not in bed with Clinton blaming the Russians hacking? The bigger question is why put yourself in a position to be hacked?
They are all singing the same tune, but none of them are showing any evidence. Just unsubstantiated claims with 'appeal to authority," that the findings were made by professionals. We don;t even know specifically what the findings are, never mind what evidence supports those findings. To the best of my knowledge, the logic amounts to "Russia is known to be skilled at hacking, they could have done this, so they probably did this."
-- The bigger question is why put yourself in a position to be hacked? --
And the only defense put up to this is "Comey said there is no evidence that the private server was compromised by a foreign government." There is all sorts of evidence the private server was under cyber attack, heck, they admit that - even shutting the server down. I run a private server at home. It uses something called TLS for security. This is easy to set up. Clinton's private server did not have even this, relying instead on unencrypted password protection. That data stream could be intercepted without leaving any trace of "hacking" on her server.