Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HiTech RedNeck
Well, that part of his opinion was correct.

It's not the Supreme Court's job to fix sh!tty legislation. It can only decide cases on constitutional grounds.

13 posted on 10/15/2016 6:04:38 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Go ahead, bite the Big Apple ... don't mind the maggots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

Whether that should truly apply, however, was denied by 4 of the other justices. I’m not sure how they would have been wrong, not just a minority.


16 posted on 10/15/2016 6:05:44 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

It’s not the Supreme Court’s job to fix sh!tty legislation. It can only decide cases on constitutional grounds.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
That’s true but it’s also true that the Constitution itself is interpreted by the Court in a manner that enables it to hand down decisions they deem are best suited to achieve desired political objectives. I believe what they do is sometimes referred to as Kabuki.


35 posted on 10/15/2016 6:41:09 PM PDT by fortes fortuna juvat (HRC, the chief puppet of anti-American Globalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson