Replies

They say they are “edited” because there is nothing else to say. When you catch someone on tape in the process, they are going to say it’s fake. If you dig deep, you’l find that none of these tapes actually were edited out of context. The criticisms are all hyperbole. For example,
They claim the ACORN tapes are fake since I didn’t “wear the pimp costume” when they told me how to disguise my 13 underage El Salvadorian sex girls on the tax returns. But not wearing a fur coat has nothing to do with the immoral and disgusting behavior.
Entities were “cleared of wrongdoing,” therefore I’m a fraud. Well, a political prosecutor doesn’t bring political charges against an entity that they like! Also, being we’re not the government, there can’t be the required criminal intent for both parties that would trigger laws being broken. The best way to see our effectiveness is to note that people do still resign or are fired and admit they said what they said.
We have a Democrat Inspector General come to our office and corroborate that everything was in context. Even the New York Times said our ACORN tapes were in context. : “Acorn’s supporters appear to hope that the whole story will fall apart over the issue of what O’Keefe wore: if that was wrong, everything else must be wrong. The record does not support them. If O’Keefe did not dress as a pimp, he clearly presented himself as one: a fellow trying to set up a woman — sometimes along with under-age girls — in a house where they would work as prostitutes. In Washington, he said the prostitution was to finance his future in politics. A worker for Acorn Housing, an allied group, warned him to stay away from the brothel lest someone “get wind that you got a house and that your girlfriend is over there running a house of women of the night. You will not have a career.”