Posted on 10/14/2016 6:34:23 AM PDT by TigerClaws
The New York Times Trump assault accuser Jessica Leeds has a story full of more holes than Swiss cheese now her story has been shown to be false exclusively here at GotNews, based on false details she told CNN about the airplane she was on when she was supposedly groped.
Jessica Leeds told Anderson Cooper on CNN that she flew on a Braniff International Airways 707 from Dallas to New York City in 1979.
However, Braniff didnt have 707 flights from Dallas to New York City, only 727s.
(Excerpt) Read more at gotnews.com ...
Braniff was the hot pants airline
based in Dallas
Deregulation killed it
Kinda like the Rolling Stones story about rape on campus, it didn’t happen but we will write, report, destroy because we are not journalists, we are left wing activists.
Trump’s lawyer sent NYT a “cease and desist” letter that must be sent before any suit is filed. They have to be afforded the opportunity to retract their story(ies). Why wouldn’t Trump file a suit? It may well take years to wind its way through the court, but this was malicious publishing with the clear intent of damaging a person’s reputation. His being a public figure doesn’t change when their intent was so clear, and their lack of investigation of the charges before publication so clear.
Maybe my children/grandchildren will watch the famous New Year’s eve ball drop from the Trump building on Trump Square .. he could well OWN those b&$#@*ds.
Because of that handsome billionaire in first class who couldn’t keep his hands off you 30 years ago?
That isnt the entire point. The testimony is that her molester raised the armrest between the two seats. So far there is no corroboration that any first class configuration ever existed in which that was possible. Ive never traveled first class air and, given the price difference, likely never will. But it would seem that the type of airplane, and probably the airline as well, would be relevant to an investigation of the armrest issue.It is one thing to claim that there was, some time in the distant past, an airline somewhere with movable armrests in first class. Disproving that could be close to proving a negative. But if the testimony contains specifics to make it more believable, they can be checked and, perhaps but not certainly, specifically disproven.
If I tell you that Donald Trump hit me with a 32 pound house bowling ball, dont you think it might be relevant if somebody asked me to prove that some specific bowling alley somewhere, ever had a 32 pound bowling ball on offer? Is it credible to believe that Trump moved an immovable object (not to mention, did it publicly without attracting attention while acting abusively toward a woman)?
Remember them well. 'Airline of the Stars'
Flew a National Lockheed Electra from Mia to Jax once.
Hated to see them go.
Kind of sad to see gizmodo lying about tech.
typical dem campaign fare, weeks to election trot out loads of unknown peeps spouting unreported 10-20-30 yr old claims that can never be proven or disproven. They need to make fakers and paid liars take a poly and depo under oath and penalty of arrest and jail. I think the numbers would shrink to nothing. The old accuser is required to prove it not the accused disproving just for some reason isn’t used.
just catching up to this after a nice weekend, but by now you’ve seen the removable armrests in Braniff first class seats, i guess.
Yes I have. While you are catching up, consider checking out this video (yeah, I know its 20 minutes long, but its worth it) by Diana Davidson (link to the thread started by GilGil):Proof That Donald Trump Does Not Assault Women (must listen)The thing that should perk up a FReepers ears is this: Diana Davidson walks you through the whole video of the Donald Trump pussy (sorry about that) incident and she takes the time to decipher what the MSM elided as crosstalk and did not include in the transcript. That changes the context of everything. Doesnt change the fact that he confessed to making a move on a married woman - but . . .
Good enough that I Bookmarked it . . .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.