Don’t know if this exists, and yes any image of a child involved in sex is illegal. I’m not saying there is any exception to the law, but the weird thing is if you have a president raping children the images would be the evidence needed to hold him responsible. Then you have the added problem that the government might hide the evidence from the people / Congress. But then we shouldn’t be in this situation because Bill Clinton shouldn’t be raping children.
The Clintons had Wellesley seal Hitlery’s senior thesis on Alinsky. Maybe people might want to know if one candidate was a marxist during her wonder years.
So yeah, from the tone of the Podesta e-mails they would try and bury this perversion, like his other rapes.
If there is a video of the ex-Prezvraping children, then viewing it could put you in possession of child porn?