.jpg)
Posted on 10/12/2016 1:04:57 PM PDT by TigerClaws
link only
If you answer a few simple questions it is obvious why hackers would target Hillary.
Who is the greater threat to Internet freedom, domestic or international, Hillary or Trump?
Who is the greater threat to International peace and resolution of conflicts, Hillary or Trump?
Who is less likely to be investigated fairly by mass media outlets, Hillary or Trump?
Who is closely allied to big multinational companies, defense contractors, and intelligence services, Hillary or Trump?
Hillary is a menace to peace and human rights anywhere on the planet, pure and simple. The hackers understand this basic fact.
“Shows Trump up big in their internal polling.”
How long ago? Was it just recently (a few days ago?) or months ago?
Re: opening for a Catholic Spring? just musing . . . From:john.podesta@gmail.com To: sandynewman@gmail.com Date: 2012-02-11 11:45 Subject: Re: opening for a Catholic Spring? just musing . . . We created Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good to organize for a moment like this. But I think it lacks the leadership to do so now. Likewise Catholics United. Like most Spring movements, I think this one will have to be bottom up. I'll discuss with Tara. Kathleen Kennedy Townsend is the other person to consult.
On 2/10/12, Sandy Newman wrote: >
Hi, John, > >
This whole controversy with the bishops opposing contraceptive coverage even > though 98% of Catholic women (and their conjugal partners) have used > contraception has me thinking . . . There needs to be a Catholic Spring, in > which Catholics themselves demand the end of a middle ages dictatorship and > the beginning of a little democracy and respect for gender equality in the > Catholic church. Is contraceptive coverage an issue around which that could > happen. The Bishops will undoubtedly continue the fight. Does the Catholic > Hospital Association support of the Administration's new policy, together > with "the 98%" create an opportunity? > >
Of course, this idea may just reveal my total lack of understanding of the > Catholic church, the economic power it can bring to bear against nuns and > priests who count on it for their maintenance, etc. Even if the idea isn't > crazy, I don't qualify to be involved and I have not thought at all about > how one would "plant the seeds of the revolution," or who would plant them. > Just wondering . . . > >
Hoping you're well, and getting to focus your time in the ways you want. > > Sandy > > Sandy Newman, President > Voices for Progress > 202.669.8754 > voicesforprogress.org >
I'm laughing so hard I'm going to aggravate my Costochondritis.
bkm
Code of the Samurai. Only one option I can see for wittle Johnny.
Waiting so long is a bad idea. There is so much early voting going on. Walk-in voters can change their minds, but every mailed ballot is an irretrievable vote. If they have the goods, they should start releasing them. A really juicy one should go out Monday so it will be fresh for the Wednesday Las Vegas debate.
Thanks for this. I’d love to believe this is true. I so want the Clintons to go down in flames. Metaphorically.
heh!
OMG....if true....EPIC!
Tactic used by Stalin, etc. Called ‘carousel voting’.
Bears repeating. Got some real nasties through the years from there.
Fingers crossed.
Not as bad as Comey. He must be freaking out. Thought it was neatly covered up. Hundreds of modern day Woodward and Bernsteins out there on the Internet high seas - we can’t trust the wapo to take down todays’s Nixon but we don’t need them anymore. Funny how many so called journalists are essentially trying to defend a Nixon.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.