Replies

The implication is in the story itself. I provided the links above. Do your own homework! Look it up!

You presented photos without links and you were asked to provide them. Provide them or go away!

Oh, according to you, because the incident happened, and it involved a Samsung phone, the guy it happened to has to be "shady"??!!

Your sole proof is that the story exists? All I can say is "WOW, that's really warped, delusional logic!" Sounds like Liberal Democrat logic to me.

You asserted that Samsung top loading washing machines couldn't possibly "explode" so I provided you with the definition of "explode" and exploded that mis-information you were promulgating.

I then proved they could explode by posting four photos of four different Samsung top loading washing machines that had indeed exploded. I don't need to provide you with links. The proof is they exploded. Pictures are worth a thousand words. They are available on Google. . . so google them. Do your own research. Now you claim that perhaps someone blew them up deliberately? You live in a delusional world of conspiracy. Don't you think the fire departments who were called out on these events would be able to determine that?

I DID deign to provide you with the statement and link the CPSC's statement in reference to what they are doing about this issue, which you claim doesn't exist. They disagree with you. There are LOTS of news stories which you claim are exaggerated. Only in your delusional world. Take a look at the Amazon reviews for Samsung Top Loading Washing Machines. Hundreds of ONE STAR REVIEWS!

You literally cannot stand anyone factually countering your load of BS, can you?