Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bryanw92

Yeah. It’s fairly common for people to note that America doesn’t actually have “poor” people. Our poor people have cell phones, cable TV and Facebook accounts.

If we want people to work, we should probably strive to make poverty less desirable. I don’t like EBT cards. I like bags of rice, bags of beans and boxes of cheese distributed once a month. Somebody wants “stuff”? They should get a job.


28 posted on 10/06/2016 5:06:24 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Abortion is what slavery was: immoral but not illegal. Not yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy

>>Yeah. It’s fairly common for people to note that America doesn’t actually have “poor” people. Our poor people have cell phones, cable TV and Facebook accounts.

>>If we want people to work, we should probably strive to make poverty less desirable. I don’t like EBT cards. I like bags of rice, bags of beans and boxes of cheese distributed once a month. Somebody wants “stuff”? They should get a job.

I agree. It’s too easy to be comfortably poor in the USA. Get some skills and do work under the table and you can live like a king and still be “poor”.


33 posted on 10/06/2016 5:09:02 AM PDT by Bryanw92 (If we had some ham, we could have ham and eggs, if we had some eggs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy

That’s right; at this point life on the dole gets you the same standard of living, in the same ghettos, as people working low-wage jobs (and they just end up tired). I believe that is what is driving the push to increase the minimum wage; rather than cut freebies (political suicide in some areas), they’d rather just make it worthwhile for someone to work low-wage jobs by giving them a slightly better standard of living than the gibsmedats.


42 posted on 10/06/2016 5:28:25 AM PDT by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: ClearCase_guy

Yes we have “obese poor”, think about it!
Throughout history until now a logical impossibility.
Historically thin meant unfed ergo poor, fat meant well fed ergo rich. In some sense our civilization should be congratulated we have solved the problem of the “poor”, but there has been a cultural cost as well as economic one.


281 posted on 10/09/2016 7:23:34 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson