Ping
What Trump needs is more Kaine!
Every conservative should study how Pence took on abortion. It was a clinic. Put the left on the defensive for partial birth abortion.
I tuned in but Kaine was being so rude and childlike with his interruptions that I tuned out.
Didn't Saul Alinsky publish the tactic to never let the opponent speak? We saw communism in action last night. What a horror show!
Pence was polite, gentlemanly and very presidential last night!
Everyone on the dem side touted Kaine being a “Harvard Trained Lawyer” but he acted like a spoiled child. Lawyers are taught not to interrupt their opponent. They are trained to wait until their opponent has finished their statement and then respond. If you interrupt another lawyer in court, you can be sanctioned or held in contempt. Well I certainly hold Kaine in contempt.
I listened to the first half hour on my drive home. Kaine would not let Pence finish a single sentence before jumping in to spew some stupid talking point. It was beyond rude.
I didn’t watch it after I got home because, frankly, I did not need to have the vision of some scary Twilight Zone puppet with Hillary pulling the strings in my mind before I went to sleep.
Kaine is a genuinely creepy looking guy. I can only imagine what he looked like when he was not only looking like a creep, but acting like one too.
Per Wikipedia, Kaine was on his high school debate team...
Ironic.
Kaine’s IQ looked low. I haven’t paid any attention to him up to now, so I don’t know if he’s smart or not, but last night he appeared to have a dim bulb. His effeminate mannerisms didn’t help.
Alas, a decent bet.
As H.L. Mencken said, "No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public."
A missed opportunity for Pence was when Kaine mentioned the New Start treaty as being something good for this country.
-It was a disaster for this country.; New Start does not even mention the tactical nuclear weapons that Russia now has a 10 to 1 advantage in, which should have been addressed in the treaty. This tactical nuclear advantage is now a Russian superiority, and directly threatens our allies.
On top of the tactical nuclear omission from the treaty, the verification of the treaty is weak, and not as verifiable as previous treaties regarding nuclear weapons.
Since that treaty has been signed, the US has declined in numbers to below the 1550 strategic weapon limit, while Russia has in fact INCREASED from several hundred fewer than we had at the time the treaty was signed, to now over 1800 countable warheads, way above the 1550 that is suppose to be in effect by 2017,,, if the Russians don’t decide to withdraw from the treaty at that time and upload to a strategic superiority as well. http://russianforces.org
And Hillary is now on the record as opposing the replacement of the nuclear cruise missile arming our bombers, which will require our bombers to penetrate the best air defense system in the world around Russia in order to provide a deterrent with just gravity bombs...
All of Russia’s bombers are missile armed, and with new designs. Russia continues to design and build new and modern strategic and tactical nuclear weapons, while we depend on a shrinking weapons stockpile that dates back 30 to almost 60 years in the case of the B-52.
We are NOT safer than we were when Obama and Hillary took control.