To: Gay State Conservative
Hmmm. So the woman who owned the house, the guy's mother, had a restraining order out on her own son, one suspects for good reason.
Explains much. Thanks for posting.
To: InABunkerUnderSF
Hmmm. So the woman who owned the house, the guy's mother, had a restraining order out on her own son, one suspects for good reason.Explains much.He admits to having done time.He admits to having used a shovel to try to pry open the garage door.It was strange that he didn't have a key.His story wasn't adding up in a number of ways.And then he gets on the phone and talks to someone whose identity (and criminal history) the cop could only guess at.Add to that the restraining order and the "long criminal history" (assuming both claims are factual) and you have a guy who the cop had *damn* good reason to be more than a little bit suspicious of.
*Damn* good reason.
To: InABunkerUnderSF
allegedly. Or it could be BS by some badge licker
132 posted on
10/03/2016 6:42:54 PM PDT by
Oztrich Boy
("Laws are for the guidance of wise men and the blind obedience of fools" Solon, Lawmaker of Athens)
To: InABunkerUnderSF; Gay State Conservative
So the woman who owned the house, the guy's mother, had a restraining order out on her own son, one suspects for good reason.If that were true, you'd hear it from the police, not a couple of local rumor spreaders (blogs).
140 posted on
10/07/2016 8:09:14 AM PDT by
Mr.Unique
(The government, by its very nature, cannot give except what it first takes.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson