If a man acts like a feminist would prefer, women will simply assume he’s gay.
She prefers Michelle over Barack?
Feminists prefer real men, yes. But they’ll still lie, cheat and backstab to destroy them.
Otherwise how will they get ahead in their own custom-made vaginal-sharia power structure?
It isn’t personal, it’s business...
Worst thing to happen in my lifetime is the pussification of men. I will have no part of it.
she’s for ILLary all the way...perhaps will secretly vote for Trump ?
Light beer and automatic transmissions destroyed the American male.
Real men are walking away from this racket.
Let this generation of females stock up on cats.
From a former submariner:
“Women have ruined more men than wars and pestilence!” - Author Unknown ;-)
Now I’ll wait for the FReeper Feminazis and their hate responses!
ROFL
You can fool the frontal lobes with mis-education.
Nerve endings that connect straight to the limbic system, however, are immune to leftist propaganda. They want what they want, and pity the fool who denies them.
Nice bush.
Behind every sensitive and in touch with his feelings man is a woman that regularly has to go hit a biker bar or truck stop.
Equality of rights is not equality of responsibility. The great failure of feminism is that it refuses to believe and in fact denies this simple truth. The Suffragettes fought for and won equal rights. Feminists fight for not accepting responsibility, as women, and thus lose. It goes to abject denial of biological reality. Male and female are complementary. Equal in rights, but each with unique responsibilities. This because, biologically, the female invests far more in reproduction--she risks her life to bring a child into the world--than the male. Thus, the primary responsibility for raising offspring falls on the female. They are her greatest investment.
In most animal species, neither parent is involved in raising offspring--once hatched or born, the little ones are on their own. Among birds and mammals, however, the female is solely involved in raising offspring. Only in a handful of species does the male have any involvement whatsoever.
Basically, in nature, the male establishes a territory, or a position in a hierarchy, in order to attract a female. The female then moves in to build her nest so that she can raise her offspring under his protection. Truly monogamous species, in which female and male, share responsibilities in raising offspring are incredibly rare.
Mate selection is solely at the discretion of the female, throughout the animal kingdom. But the dynamic under discussion remains the same--the male establishes a territory and the female builds a nest. Hence, the definitions of masculinity and femininity become real. Of course, the female is attracted to the dominant male. He can best provide for and protect her, and possesses the best or most preferable genes for her offspring. Her foremost concern is producing viable offspring, otherwise the investment is not worth the risk. The Suffragettes understood and accepted this. They fought for equal rights, but they did not question their responsibility in choosing their husband and raising their children. They fully realized that they were free to work and pursue a career, but in a chosen marriage they took their roles as wife, partner, and mother, parent, seriously.
The Feminists, beginning with Simone de Beauvoir, live-in girlfriend of John Paul Sartre, a Marxist, argued that was oppression. Because Feminism, Marxism in a dress, sees the responsibility for raising children as belonging to the state. No longer was it the role of a woman to be a partner to a man and a parent to her child. The central premise of Marxism is that the nuclear family must be dissolved so that the state could control the people and rule over all things. Thus women as workers are reduced to baby factories, and the children are handed over to the state, so that the women can return to work. And men as workers are reduced to sperm donors, so that the men can return to work. It's all about subservience to the state. And the family becomes inconsequential as extinguished.
There is no romance is this bleak society. No courtship, no love exists between man and woman. Nor is there any love between parents and children. Everyone is just a cog in the dismal machine.
Question: why was Hera the most powerful of the Olympians? Because she was goddess of the bed. Women have understood this for thousands of years. Feminists forgot it in forty.
From the bed, all life is born. Everything--family, society, culture, civilization, humanity--ultimately descends from the bed of a woman, her chosen mate and her children. The great lie of Feminism is that it does not.
Note that in Genesis, Adam is made of earth but Eve is made of human. That makes the female a higher order of creation, which places the greater responsibility on her. Note also that when Eve seduces Adam, after the Fall when God confronts them both in Eden, God does not question Eve. He questions Adam. "What did you do?"
Interesting take IMO.
As a semi-prominent so-called feminist - whose name I did not note at the time - wrote around 1992:
“The problem with sexism is that it’s sexy.”
Communists just cannot accept Nature: Their Luciferian hubris tells them that they can usurp the role and power of God the Creator by changing biological reality merely by legislating it.
Communists - including ideological feminists - demand equality of outcome: That is inherently artificial and therefore invariably requires governmental coercion to create.
C. S. Lewis wrote in That Hideous Strength of how Jane Studdock rebelled at sexual submission to her husband Mark “in the very teeth of instinct”: Her body and her spirit both wanted to submit to his possession, but her secular, academic indoctrination made her hate her natural responses to male domination.
I have long believed that one of the secret reasons that feminists refuse to denounce Islamic males, who routinely dominate and degrade women to an unsurpassed degree, is that they subconsciously find them more virile and attractive than the neutered males they have produced in our own culture.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/09/29/hey-how-about-pantsuit-tee-hillary-selling-clothing-for-emasculated-man.html
Oh dear Gaia this Lell is from Seattle. Run men Run!
Also, apparently from her words she has already chewed up
at least two husbands.
Even if they do - I won’t date them. I won’t have any part of their messed up ‘truths’.