Paul Newman says: "Yes!"
Posted on 09/28/2016 11:10:44 AM PDT by gaggs
Video: Did Hillary Clinton and Lester Holt use signals and triggers during the debate? You decide.
(Excerpt) Read more at commonsenseevaluation.com ...
Democrats were involved, of course it was.
Go to #Riggeddebate for all the evidence
Does a bear take an Obama in the woods?
If a democrat, especially a Clinton, is involved in anything it’s a safe bet that there is some sort of cheating going on.
Does a bear use the woods for a bathroom?
Hill & Bill have CHEATED their entire lives, just ask Bill and Chelsea’s father Webster Hubbell.
You beat me to it! I like your version better, though.
It was rigged!
Lester Holt is supposed to be a Republican. Really? He seems to me to be firmly “with her”!!
Paul Newman says: "Yes!"
In this and countless other ways large and small. There were national journalists involved. Journalists. The most lying subversive scum of the earth — journalists.
I wish a bear would take the real obama into the woods.
Showing ‘fast forward’ scrolls of Hillary in her prior debates would be helpful. If she never touches her face, then this debate is highly suspect.
The narrative 'Trump will crush Hillary' and 'Trump will probably win' was also a media narrative in order to raise expectations for Trump and set a low bar for Hillary making it easier for her to 'win' the debate.
Ridiculous - she was just trying to tell Lester to lay down a sacrifice bunt.
You need to see the Twitter link that shows an old grey haired man get papers from Hilliary;s podium and then hand them off to LESTER DOLT!!!
VERY interesting video. I had my doubts, but I think she probably was signaling to Holt.
#riggeddebate or Hillary has a new twitch.
I posted this on another thread... it was indeed intentional and needs to be investigated:
“Not just 6 separate signals to Holt but those were the only times she scratched her face in that manner and it was ALWAYS followed by an interruption/response by Holt.
If it were truly an involuntary or random event one would expect no such response by Holt or that he might interrupt Trump before Illary scratched her nose/face.
Just the probability of all six occurrences happening randomly in that sequence are 1 out of 64 times. And that is without the probability of no other such random signals happening over a 90 minute debate period.
The probability of collusion here is extremely high.”
Problem is the Commission for Presidential Debates is dominated by Dem & Rep party hacks and includes several university presidents. Objectivity means jack to this organization.
Poker Pro Agrees - Hillary was sending hand signals to debate moderator Holt
I doubt anybody looks for signals on a regular basis much more than a professional poker player...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.