Posted on 09/28/2016 5:26:05 AM PDT by kevcol
Donaldf Trump has warned he is willing to unleash “extremely rough” personal attacks on Hillary Clinton in the next Presidential debate.
The Republican hopeful said he came close to exploiting Bill Clinton’s previous sex scandals but chose not to because the Clinton’s daughter, Chelsea, was in attendance.
.
.
Following the debate, Hillary Clinton’s official Twitter account released a short video of the Venezuelan model detailing the reported abuse she allegedly suffered at the hands of Trump
(Excerpt) Read more at express.co.uk ...
I’m surprised Trump hasn’t touched the Hillary defended a child rapist and bullied his victim issue. That is kryptonite right there against Hillary’s “fighting for children” nonsense.
“He wouldnt have to come across as the bully which I agree he needs to avoid.”
I want him to bully Clinton. She deserves it.
Last debate he fought on her ground and lost.
He would do better pointing out hILLBillary’s 6% solution for America. That is in reference to the Clinton Foundations rate of return of actual disbursements to charitable recipients. In other words, she is an executive with a 6% effectiveness rating.
Mention the affairs in townhall meetings and ads, but keep it out of the debates.
Hillary’s “fighting for children”
That Ad gets particularly under my skin. I know it should not but what a criminal!
Children, she will cause your children to suffer, worse, take away their Rights. Oh wait................!!!!!
I dont think he lost and he certainly didn’t fight on her ground, he was constantly chiming in which was nice to see and in stark contrast to Romney.
I am happy for him to bully Clinton, but he needs to bully her over issues that matter - if he starts going after her husband, the mushy middle grounders will turn off. It won’t work. He can still strike her on that without doing it so overtly.
I don’t think he should go with the Hubbell angle.
Good catch! This is typical of the eighth grader mentality that is today’s media.
I was only being semi-serious, but have a surrogate bring it up somewhere.
Yep. If he brings it up at all. I think he needs to reserve this as a defense to the charge that he is a misogynist, and it should be the second and secondary line of attack, after he touts his record of hiring and promoting women.
He should bring up her treatment of the Secret Service.
It didn’t hurt Bill then, much less now.
I would go after his treTment not affairs just in case he had one
“...... he came close to exploiting Bill Clinton’s previous sex scandals but chose not to because the Clinton’s daughter, Chelsea, was in attendance.”........
If the ugly bitch hasn’t been aware of what her father has done to women in the past, she has been living under a rock. Chelsa is not the one running for president nor is her father, Trump needs go after Hitlary for what SHE did to the victims Billy Bob raped and abused. Attack Hitlary’s “war on women”.
They are doing exactly like you say baiting him when she brings up sex everyone sees her as the hypocrite being married to Bill....
If Trump mentions Billy boy’s sexual escapades at all, it should only be in the context of Hillary covering them up and intimidating the women involved.
This should be Trump’s response when Pickle Clinton claims that “Trump is anti-woman.”
Make Chelsea cry!
Yes, Trump, only talk about the intimidation and threat tactics. About HILLARY being Bills fixer/hitman.
As usual, the thread is turned into another “Advice for Donald Trump thread. This is a man who “can’t win” who, nevertheless, is leading in the polls. How about we watch and/or read one of his books and take advice from him?
He isn’t going to do it. He is only saying this, so that they would STFU about the fat Miss Universe.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.