[Hillary Clinton Written Answers Under Oath Due 9/29/2016 ]
Hmmmmm. I wonder if she is going to flee the country? /s
More likke written “WHO ME. Do that? Not ME!”
I thought I read that she got a 3-week or so extension on that, due to she had been “sick”. ??
Taking the “Fifth” or drinking a “Fifth”, its all the same to her.
26. “Do you or any of your former staff members at the State Department know anything about the Bill of Rights aside from the 5th Amendment?”
Wikileaks.....if ya got the smoking gun, now would be a great time to share.
Hillary perfected the tactic of ‘deniable ignorance” during her various appearances under oath in previous scandals such as Travelgate, Cattlegate, and Whitewater.
In essence this tactic requires the target of a question to respond with one of several excuses for a non-responsive answer. [eg, I don’t recall, I don’t have any specific recollection of that (insert document, email, conversation as necessary), I have no recollection of that.]
You will note that it is a tactic used by all of the Clinton Crime Syndicate including former attorney General Eric Holder during the Mark Rich congressional hearing and recently in the Fast&Furious hearings before Congress.
Under our system of government you can’t force someone to testify truthfully and using the ‘deniable ignorance’ tactic avoids using the 5th Amendment to protect prosecutable wrongdoing. The 5th has become a legal manouver that is familiar & recognized by even the Joe Six-Packs of the world as a way to dodge criminal liability.
In addition her lawyers will object to questions being too wordy, vague or requiring information not available or too burdensome to amass.
The chances of getting anything other than variations of those responses are less than 1 in a 100 in my opinion.