Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/26/2016 7:45:58 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: Nachum

Trump never mentioned the neocon agenda, no once.


2 posted on 09/26/2016 7:47:57 PM PDT by Bogie (Just a coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Trump smacked him down like a Nancy-girl.


3 posted on 09/26/2016 7:47:59 PM PDT by kiryandil (George H. W. Bush: "Read my lips. I'm a Republican.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

He let her talk for 20 minutes and Trump for 20 seconds,,, It was a Hillary infomercial.


4 posted on 09/26/2016 7:48:03 PM PDT by MHT (,`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

I have no doubt who Holt was stumping for.


5 posted on 09/26/2016 7:48:11 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Who will be fact checking the "fact checkers"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Holt asked Trump about 0dungheap’s birth certificate but didn’t ask Hillary about her email crimes?


6 posted on 09/26/2016 7:49:13 PM PDT by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America ((Some of you characterized my FReep name as 'paranoid' a few years back.. Care to apologize now?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Terrible but to be expected. The Uniparty will use every trick in the book against Trump.

Trump scored some points. He did fine. If people want the slick politician full of it, they’ve got Hillary.

If they want real change and to change course, they’ve got Trump.


8 posted on 09/26/2016 7:50:09 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

...a better excerpt...
-
Tax returns.
Holt never asked Clinton about her e-mail scandal, about Benghazi, or about the Clinton Foundation and its dubious dealings. But he did ask Trump about his tax returns, arguing — not asking — that there might be questionable information in them that the American public deserved to hear.

Birther conspiracy theory.
Holt never asked Clinton about her past record of racist statements, including her “super-predator” remarks as First Lady, or her explicit appeal to “white Americans” in her 2008 primary campaign against Obama. Yet he asked Trump about the Birther conspiracy theory and cast it as racist.

Stop-and-frisk.
After an exchange between the candidates over the policy of “stop-and-frisk,” Holt interjected to bolster Clinton’s point by stating, erroneously, that stop-and-frisk had ended in New York because it had been declared unconstitutional by a court. Trump countered, correctly, that the new mayor had canceled the policy before the litigation was over.

“A presidential look.”
Towards the end of the debate, Holt asked Trump about what he meant by saying Hillary Clinton did not have “a presidential look.” He did so after noting that Clinton had become “the first woman” to be nominated for president by a major political party, thus setting Trump up as a sexist. As Trump answered, Holt interrupted him, then gave Clinton a chance to respond with her talking points about Trump’s past comments on women.

Iraq War.
The question of whether Trump supported the Iraq War or not has been widely debated. What is beyond doubt is that Hillary Clinton voted for it. Holt only represented one side of the debate about Trump, and never asked Clinton about her own vote.


9 posted on 09/26/2016 7:50:27 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (I was conceived in liberty, how about you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
Nearly all questions went to Hillary FIRST, except for the GOTCHA QUESTION about nuclear 'first use' policy which went to Trump.

The Hillary/Holt love affair blossomed tonight.

Hillary came across SCRIPTED, Trump did NOT.

10 posted on 09/26/2016 7:51:59 PM PDT by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America ((Some of you characterized my FReep name as 'paranoid' a few years back.. Care to apologize now?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Molester Dolt should be fired for journalistic malfeasance.


11 posted on 09/26/2016 7:52:05 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Surprised Lester wasn’t wearing his Hillary “H” button on his lapel.


15 posted on 09/26/2016 7:53:23 PM PDT by From The Deer Stand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Well, it saved Lester’s skin—ie from getting the Matt Lauer treatment.

He will be a hero to the MSM.


18 posted on 09/26/2016 7:55:08 PM PDT by reagandemocrat (Go Katica)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

You’re right!!!!

PHOOEY to WORTHLESS Lester Holt!!!!

And this was after “the moderators” put out an article the they did not want to intervene in the debate like Candy Crowley! That was a BIG LIE!!!!

PHOOEY to the WORTHLESS media, once again!!!! They are POISON!!!


19 posted on 09/26/2016 7:55:22 PM PDT by Honorary Serb (Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Hillary obviously had access to the questions beforehand. Lester barely started one question, and she began to gush will glee before she could possibily have known the full question. I was surprised how easy Trump went on her health.


20 posted on 09/26/2016 7:56:07 PM PDT by aimhigh (1 John 3:23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Lester Holt is taking a beating on Twitter right now. He will turn out to be the biggest loser of tonight’s debate.


21 posted on 09/26/2016 7:56:08 PM PDT by McGruff (Have you seen the new movie, Weekend at Hillary's?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

What do expect from a libtard? They will defend the wife of the rapist at all costs!


23 posted on 09/26/2016 7:57:59 PM PDT by Busko (The only thing that is certain is that nothing is certain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
I think Holt should be a new word in the Webster dictionary.

Holt - to trivialize serious subject matter for partisan reasons.

"The debate started ok but the moderate started to holt the candidate with personal questions."

28 posted on 09/26/2016 8:00:07 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Lester “The Fact Checker” Holt. WHAT A DISGRACE!


30 posted on 09/26/2016 8:01:16 PM PDT by TTFlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

She was also single screen for her opening remarks.

Trump had a split screen with her making faces during his opening remarks.


31 posted on 09/26/2016 8:01:41 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Forty-three days until Presdient Pre-elect Donald J. Trump. Help is on the way...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Why did Hillary have notes? Does that mean she had the questions before the debate and was able to spend the week preparing for this debate?


33 posted on 09/26/2016 8:02:17 PM PDT by Parmy (II don't know how to past the images.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Why did Prince Reibus the RNC chairman approve of liberal moderators for these debates again? How can he sleep at night?


34 posted on 09/26/2016 8:03:51 PM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson