Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pfflier

“It would be far easier just to jam it.”

Perhaps, but wouldn’t you need to know the frequency?


38 posted on 09/26/2016 3:24:52 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: traderrob6

If it does, it will be in front of 100 million people.


40 posted on 09/26/2016 3:26:09 PM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: traderrob6
The hildabeast would have to receive a RF signal tuned to her receiver. A freq spectrum analyzer is a standard piece of equipment. It would tell you which frequencies are active.

Also listening devices are regulated to operate in certain RF bands. If you have a radio, you know certain channels are assigned and both transmitter and receiver need to operate on the same channel.

Using knowledge of this, you could easily (and legally) operate another transmitter on the channel if it is a commercial channel.

68 posted on 09/26/2016 4:25:24 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: traderrob6

“Perhaps, but wouldn’t you need to know the frequency?”

Those devices work in narrow fequency range. You can buy jammers commercially. In France theatres all have building wide jammers installed. They are illegal in the US but I had a cell phone jammer when I lived in HK.

I used it on the mass transit system to stop fools from yelling curse words into their cell phones. It was great fun. I’d turn it on for about 15 seconds at a time


72 posted on 09/26/2016 4:32:25 PM PDT by Fai Mao (PIAPS for Prison 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson