Posted on 09/26/2016 12:20:44 AM PDT by aquila48
SpaceX has done its first test of the Raptor rocket engine that will take humans to Mars as early as 2024, Elon Musk said in a series of tweets. It was fired at the company's McGregor, Texas facility on a stand that can handle the extreme thrust. Pointing out the "mach diamonds" from the test (above), Musk said the "production Raptor goal is a specific impulse of 382 seconds and thrust of 3 MN [680,000 pounds]," more than three times that of the current Falcon 9.
With nine of the methane-fueled motors, the Red Dragon will be far more powerful than any current rocket. It'll eventually lift the Mars Colonial Transporter, loaded with 100 tons of cargo, toward the red planet. The company plans to launch an unmanned craft to Mars by 2018 and get humans there by 2024. That's an ambitious target, especially considering its recent launchpad mishap.
Elon Musk will give a speech tomorrow at the International Astronautical Conference in Mexico, titled "Making Humans a Multiplanetary Species." He's expected to unveil the design of the Mars Colonial Transporter and overall plan for colonizing the red planet. Musk will also reportedly talk about the budget and try to convince government and the scientific community to help pay for the undertaking. After the recent disaster, a successful test-firing of the Raptor will no doubt help his cause.
(Excerpt) Read more at engadget.com ...
“This plot [see chart at link] shows the orbital height of the ISS over the last year. Clearly visible are the re-boosts which suddenly increase the height, and the gradual decay in between. The height is averaged over one orbit, and the gradual decrease is caused by atmospheric drag.
As can be seen from the plot, the rate of descent is not constant and this variation is caused by changes in the density of the tenuous outer atmosphere due mainly to solar activity.”
http://heavens-above.com/IssHeight.aspx?lat=40.7759&lng=-73.9677&loc=Unspecified&alt=21&tz=EST
It's not "distance from Earth" that matters, but "time on station". You use the latter to model and find solutions for the former.
You appear to be under the misconception that this will be a "one ship trip".....it won't. Drone ships will be pre-launched and landed on Mars with materials and supplies, and possibly even during the transit phase (launched after the manned vehicle, but using higher accelerations to catch up and match velocity "in-flight").
Shielding is just a matter of arranging the mass you already have to carry, and will probably be water (actually ice). See "storm shelter" concept.
Stay tuned... Musk is going to reveal some of his ideas tomorrow at a conference in Guadalajara.
http://www.theverge.com/2016/9/21/12891322/elon-musk-spacex-mars-colonization-mission-rocket
Drinking and eating what used to be urine and feces, without Earth’s gradual recycling through soil and sun that allows us to not have to think about it, is something the astronauts might have to learn to stomach.
Sorry, but the astronauts on the ISS are already ‘stomach’ing this. The ISS recycles 93% of its water, including urine.
I understand the curiosity and the “need” to discover, but my inference was purely logistical.
Right now, with our current technology, the only viable solution would have to be robotics.
Mars seems to be about the limit of endurance for human travel.
"Right now, with our current technology..." the US couldn't put a man on the moon, yet we once did. Technology changes. Musk and others are driving those changes, since NASA has been emasculated and eviscerated.
"Mars seems to be about the limit of endurance for human travl."
Based on what?? The limit of endurance depends on the conditions of the system used, and neither you nor I know what that will be. All the technology discussed by Arthur C. Clarke in 2001 is realizable with today's technology base.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.