Posted on 09/25/2016 7:59:09 PM PDT by TaxPayer2000
Well; THAT's interesting!
I thought a selfie was like a timer with a zero delay time.
Back in the day, we placed the camera on a tripod, clicked the button and had 10 seconds to run back and get in the picture.
Sounds like a rim-to-rim in the Grand Canyon; only inverted!
(And a bit less oxygen; too!)
It is a form of self gratification, is it not?
>>And the man still bears no responsibility for for that either? It’s all the women’s responsibility?
If two people do something and one of them is going to be harmed much more than the other 100% of the time, then it is just basic intelligence for the person who will be hurt the most to take the most precautions. Are you such a feminist that you can’t understand this basic premise?
>>What a load of Bu!! $#!t.
>>Here’s clearly some news to you. Men can say *No* too.
Yes they can. But they won’t. It is hardwired into their brain as the primary driver in human reproduction. Why do women always assume that men have to give up 40,000 years of instincts so the women can fornicate freely? Is uncontrolled fornication that important to you? It’s so hilarious that modern women rank their “empowerment” as the number of the men who have used them as a sperm receptacle and then moved on.
If they want to put their life in danger!!
...after the woman has already decided upon YES!!!
to have your picture taken?
If one were of the same mind as Anthony Weiner, yes! Don’t fool yourself, there are a good many “Anthony’s” and Toni’s across the fruited plain. Taking a selfie is very inspiring and gratifying to them.
It is because I love women that I want them (and their husbands) to follow scripture. Men need to be the leaders of their families and treat their families with respect. Women, in such a situation, should have no problem submitting to the leadership of their husbands.
It is because I love women that I want them (and their husbands) to follow scripture. Men need to be the leaders of their families and treat their families with respect. Women, in such a situation, should have no problem submitting to the leadership of their husbands.
And exactly how is that related to women voting? And why would that make you want to discourage women from voting?
There's NOTHING in Scripture that even alludes to women not being capable of participating in politics.
Denying women the vote is as sexist as it comes. Denying them the right to vote because of their gender is as bad as denying people to vote based on skin color.
Do you also wish that blacks could be discouraged from voting but alas, the clock can't be turned back on that either?
And what about single women? You love women so much and want to protect them? From VOTING?
How does keeping them from the vote protect them? What harm is voting going to cause women?
Haven't read Proverbs 31 recently, have you?
Thanks! You’re right. ;-)
Yer right on this!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.