Posted on 09/25/2016 12:39:13 PM PDT by Be Careful
As most of you know, I had been endorsing Hillary Clinton for president, for my personal safety, because I live in California. It isnt safe to be a Trump supporter where I live. And its bad for business too. But recently I switched my endorsement to Trump, and I owe you an explanation. So here it goes.
1. Things I Dont Know: There are many things I dont know. For example, I dont know the best way to defeat ISIS. Neither do you. I dont know the best way to negotiate trade policies. Neither do you. I dont know the best tax policy to lift all boats. Neither do you. My opinion on abortion is that men should follow the lead of women on that topic because doing so produces the most credible laws. So on most political topics, I dont know enough to make a decision. Neither do you, but you probably think you do.
Given the uncertainty about each candidate at least in my own mind I have been saying I am not smart enough to know who would be the best president. That neutrality changed when Clinton proposed raising estate taxes. I understand that issue and I view it as robbery by government.
Ill say more about that, plus some other issues I do understand, below.
2. Confiscation of Property: Clinton proposed a new top Estate Tax of 65% on people with net worth over $500 million. Her website goes to great length to obscure the actual policy details, including the fact that taxes would increase on lower value estates as well. See the total lack of transparency here, where the text simply refers to going back to 2009 rates. It is clear that the intent of the page is to mislead, not inform.
So dont fall for the claim that Clinton has plenty of policy details on her website. She does, but it is organized to mislead, not to inform. Thats far worse than having no details.
The bottom line is that under Clintons plan, estate taxes would be higher for anyone with estates over $5 million(ish). I call this a confiscation tax because income taxes have already been paid on this money. In my case, a dollar I earn today will be taxed at about 50% by various government entities, collectively. With Clintons plan, my remaining 50 cents will be taxed again at 50% when I die. So the government would take 75% of my earnings from now on.
Yes, I can do clever things with trusts to avoid estate taxes. But that is just welfare for lawyers. If the impact of the estate tax is nothing but higher fees for my attorney, and hassle for me, that isnt good news either.
You can argue whether an estate tax is fair or unfair, but fairness is an argument for idiots and children. Fairness isnt an objective quality of the universe. I oppose the estate tax because I was born to modest means and worked 7-days a week for most of my life to be in my current position. (Im working today, Sunday, as per usual.) And I dont want to give 75% of my earnings to the government. (Would you?)
3. Party or Wake: It seems to me that Trump supporters are planning for the worlds biggest party on election night whereas Clinton supporters seem to be preparing for a funeral. I want to be invited to the event that doesnt involve crying and moving to Canada. (This issue isnt my biggest reason.)
4. Clintons Health: To my untrained eyes and ears, Hillary Clinton doesnt look sufficiently healthy mentally or otherwise to be leading the country. If you disagree, take a look at the now-famous Why arent I 50 points ahead video clip. Likewise, Bill Clinton seems to be in bad shape too, and Hillary wouldnt be much use to the country if she is taking care of a dying husband on the side.
5. Pacing and Leading: Trump always takes the extreme position on matters of safety and security for the country, even if those positions are unconstitutional, impractical, evil, or something that the military would refuse to do. Normal people see this as a dangerous situation. Trained persuaders like me see this as something called pacing and leading. Trump paces the public meaning he matches them in their emotional state, and then some. He does that with his extreme responses on immigration, fighting ISIS, stop-and-frisk, etc. Once Trump has established himself as the biggest bad-ass on the topic, he is free to lead, which we see him do by softening his deportation stand, limiting his stop-and-frisk comment to Chicago, reversing his first answer on penalties for abortion, and so on. If you are not trained in persuasion, Trump look scary. If you understand pacing and leading, you might see him as the safest candidate who has ever gotten this close to the presidency. Thats how I see him.
So when Clinton supporters ask me how I could support a fascist, the answer is that he isnt one. Clintons team, with the help of Godzilla, have effectively persuaded the public to see Trump as scary. The persuasion works because Trumps pacing system is not obvious to the public. They see his first offers as evidence of evil. They are not. They are technique.
And being chummy with Putin is more likely to keep us safe, whether you find that distasteful or not. Clinton wants to insult Putin into doing what we want. That approach seems dangerous as hell to me.
6. Persuasion: Economies are driven by psychology. If you expect things to go well tomorrow, you invest today, which causes things to go well tomorrow, as long as others are doing the same. The best kind of president for managing the psychology of citizens and therefore the economy is a trained persuader. You can call that persuader a con man, a snake oil salesman, a carnival barker, or full of shit. Its all persuasion. And Trump simply does it better than I have ever seen anyone do it.
The battle with ISIS is also a persuasion problem. The entire purpose of military action against ISIS is to persuade them to stop, not to kill every single one of them. We need military-grade persuasion to get at the root of the problem. Trump understands persuasion, so he is likely to put more emphasis in that area.
Most of the job of president is persuasion. Presidents dont need to understand policy minutia. They need to listen to experts and then help sell the best expert solutions to the public. Trump sells better than anyone you have ever seen, even if you havent personally bought into him yet. You cant deny his persuasion talents that have gotten him this far.
In summary, I dont understand the policy details and implications of most of either Trumps or Clintons proposed ideas. Neither do you. But I do understand persuasion. I also understand when the government is planning to confiscate the majority of my assets. And I can also distinguish between a deeply unhealthy person and a healthy person, even though I have no medical training. (So can you.)
I will be live streaming my viewing of the debate Monday night, with my co-host and neighbor, Kristina Basham. Tune your television to the debate and use your phone or iPad with the Periscope app, and look for me at @ScottAdamsSays.
Good stuff, but I don’t understand the Dilbert reference.
Scott Adams IS Dilbert’s creator.
I question his judgment.
There’s no way any sane person should even consider voting for PIAPS!
Scott Adams is the author of the Dilbert comic strip...
Vote Trump!
Thanks for posting this.
Dilbert is one of the few comics I read. Scott Adams is wonderful.
He is the creator of Dilbert.
Actually I do understand a lot of it an I suspect that a lot more people do (on the conservative side anyway) than Adams gives us credit for.
Ok, then be sure to turn in your man-card on abortion.
I’m a man so I can’t judge right or wrong when it comes to innocent life?
B.S.
When he says he is voting for Hillary, for his safety, it always told me he wasn’t voting for her.
He’s the guy that writes Dilbert.
When he says he is voting for Hillary, for his safety, it always told me he wasnt voting for her.
Yes. I understand the need for Keystone, for one thing. And death tax increases have no affect on me, so that issue is no motivator. I also understand what will happen to the Supreme Court if Hillary wins, and what will happen if you don’t get control of our borders.
You’re right. If Scott doesn’t understand this stuff, I’m glad he’s not running for the office.
I read him on Twitter. .he’s brilliant.
This is a smart and honest endorsement.
No, I think he said originally that he had to be seen as supporting Hillary for his own safety, not that he intended to vote for her.
Scott Adams is brilliant . I read him regular. He was a professional hypnotist as well as in business world and creator of Dilbert. He’s not a politico but he is observer of the art of “persuation” and he says Trump is a Master Persuader...Hillary hired this guy he calls Godzilla who is also a master persuder. Anyhow he has intresting observations. He said earlier this week if nothing strange happens Trump has already run and all you need to determine that is Hillarys rant of “why am i not fifty points ahead”
Not what she said cause Adams says nobody cares it was the tone and scolding way she said it...she knows she is losing.
This was enjoyable! Thanks for posting.
See post 10 above.
I can’t tell if he is a closeted Republican or a fed up democrat..kind of sounds more like a fed up democrat.
Either way he is voting for Trump.
Apparently he has more sense than H. Bush, Glenn Beck and some die hard Cruzbots. Yipes!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.