Posted on 09/25/2016 5:03:16 AM PDT by nikos1121
ON THE OCCASION OF THE FIRST DEBATE BETWEEN
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
Donald John Trump
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY, HEMPSTEAD, NY
9 PM MONDAY SEPTEMBER 26, 2016
The 90 minute debate will be divided into six time segments of approximately 15 minutes each on major topics to be selected by the moderator and announced at least one week before the debate. The moderator will open each segment with a question, after which each candidate will have two minutes to respond. Candidates will then have an opportunity to respond to each other. The moderator will use the balance of the time in the segment for a deeper discussion of the topic.
Actually, he looks great, and your commenting to the contrary - for some suspicious reason - over and over will not make it otherwise.
Third attack by Holt.
None on ....
He’s doing a great job of flipping the question to crime in general.
Lester really is tag teaming—only asking attempted zingers of Trump.
Stiffed means didn’t pay.
She is going on that tack. It explains why she opened with her father as a drape hanger.
It was weird. Now we can see how it fit in their script.
Why is Donald not doing well? All the FR posters thinks he’s doing great. Or is this just wishful thinking on their part?
Yes, Hillary is very well rehearsed, and she is staying on script.
Trump should have prepared. He is missing some easy points.
Stop and Frisk
Trump 1
Holt 0
The gun control thing is a BIG LOSER.
Trump talks real. Hillary talks sound bites.
I’m looking at her eyes too - very glassy. Pupils fixed and dilated?
I third that
According to Frank Luntz, he is dusting her with Independents
Sweet!
Hillary’s been at it for almost an hour...hitting a critical time now as she was at the memorial 90 minutes when her meds started to bottom out.
Lots of Trolls on this thread. They are desperate.
Trump is winning this debate by a landslide.
Corrupt is coming off as CORRUPT.
Proud of Trump. He LOVES our country.
After he got her talking about the e-mails, he should have spent the entire time going over all of the national security implications and revelations of corruption, lying under oath, lying repeatedly about their being no classified material on the e-mails, e-mails from CentCom, deleting with BleachBit, etc. - she would have been on the defensive in her response time. instead, he spent a very brief moment on the e-mails then went back to his tax returns / business dealings and her response was entirely trying to paint him as corrupt instead of being forced to defend against her own corruption.
Wow, so many conflicting opinions here tonight...like a ping pong game.
It’s two against one. Lester Holt makes Candy Crowley look moderate.
Nothing on wikipedia about it being unconstitutional. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop-and-frisk_in_New_York_City
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.